Yet Another Bulletin Board

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Oct 22nd, 2019, 12:16pm

Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Member Map Member Map Login Login Register Register
Clusterheadaches.com Message Board Fresh Research - Gamma Knife


   Clusterheadaches.com Message Board
   New Message Board Archives
   Medications, Treatments, Therapies 2005
(Moderator: DJ)
   Fresh Research - Gamma Knife
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: Fresh Research - Gamma Knife  (Read 226 times)
floridian
Guest

Email

Fresh Research - Gamma Knife
« on: Jan 18th, 2005, 8:40am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify Remove Remove

A study of ten patients who got gamma knife surgery for CH.  While some patients showed good or dramatic improvement, many did not.  Significant side effects included nerve damage that led to paraesthesia (phantom pain or phantom feelings/idiopathic sensations) or hypoesthesia (loss of sensation/nerve function).  The study concluded that current gamma knife techniques are not ready for prime time, and in fact many gamma knife centers stopped using this procedure for CH some time ago.  
 
Quote:
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Feb;76(2):218-221.  
    Gamma knife treatment for refractory cluster headache: prospective open trial.
 
    Donnet A, Valade D, Regis J.   Service de Neurochirurgie, Hopital la Timone, 264 bd Saint Pierre, 13385 Marseille Cedex 05, France. adonnet@AP-HM.fr.
 
    BACKGROUND: Since the initial report of Ford et al in 1998 no further study has evaluated radiosurgery of the trigeminal nerve in chronic cluster headache (CCH). METHODS: We carried out a prospective open trial of neurosurgery and enrolled 10 patients (nine men, one woman; mean age 49.8 years, range 32-77) presenting with severe and drug resistant CCH (mean duration 9 years, range 2-33). The cisternal segment of the nerve was targeted with a single 4 mm collimator (80-85 Gy max). RESULTS: The mean follow up was 13.2 months. No improvement was observed in two patients and three patients had no further attacks. Three patients showed dramatic improvement with a few attacks per month or very few attacks over the last six months. Two patients were pain free for only one and two weeks and their headaches recurred with the same severity as before. Three patients developed paraesthesia with no hypoaesthesia, one developed hypoaesthesia, and one developed deafferentation pain. CONCLUSIONS: The rate and severity of trigeminal nerve injury appeared to be significantly higher than in trigeminal neuralgia, and this study does not support the positive results of the study of Ford et al. We consider the morbidity to be significant for the low rate of pain cessation, making this procedure less attractive even for the more severely affected subgroup of patients.
« Last Edit: Jan 18th, 2005, 8:46am by floridian » IP Logged
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »


Clusterheadaches.com Message Board » Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.3.1!
YaBB 2000-2003. All Rights Reserved.


1998-2010 Web Vision Enterprises All rights reserved. All information on this site is protected by international copyright laws. You may not re-distribute any information from this site without written permission from Web Vision Enterprises and the webmaster of this site. Violators will be prosecuted.
You may view our privacy policy and financial disclosure statement here

test rss