New CH.com Forum
http://www.clusterheadaches.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl
Daily Chat >> General Posts >> Obama Lawsuit
http://www.clusterheadaches.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1224729303

Message started by Callico on Oct 22nd, 2008 at 10:35pm

Title: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Callico on Oct 22nd, 2008 at 10:35pm
Barak Obama is being sued by a Democratic lawyer and former Deputy Attorney General for PA and former Democratic candidate for Governor of PA to force him to release his birth certificate to prove that he is a natural born US citizen.  He claims Obama was actually born in Nigeria, and also that he became an Indonesian citizen when his stepfather took him to Indonesia and put him in school there.  Obama is refusing to release any of these documents.  

Here is an interesting video interview with the attorney.  Is he right?  I have no idea, nor am I insinuating one.  I just find it interesting that Obama won't produce documentation like John McCain did concerning his birth to a US Navy officer in Panama.  Watch the video and give your thoughts.  (Not a diatribe, just your thoughts on the case before the judge.)

START PRINTPAGEMultimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!!  You need to Login or RegisterEND PRINTPAGE

Jerry

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Melissa on Oct 22nd, 2008 at 10:38pm
Jerry, I've read a shitload about Berg, and it seems he is a loon. (from what I've gathered)


Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by deltadarlin on Oct 23rd, 2008 at 7:56am
START PRINTPAGEMultimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!!  You need to Login or RegisterEND PRINTPAGE

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Just Plain Carl on Oct 23rd, 2008 at 8:54am
All very interesting.  Too bad it won't amount to anything.

Jerry,
    Tell your son "SEMPER FI"  !!!!!  from a former Marine

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Charlie on Oct 23rd, 2008 at 11:06am
Someone proposed the same idiotic thing with McCain during the primaries as he was supposedly born in the Canal Zone.   :o 8-)

Charlie

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by FramCire on Oct 23rd, 2008 at 12:03pm

Charlie wrote on Oct 23rd, 2008 at 11:06am:
Someone proposed the same idiotic thing with McCain during the primaries as he was supposedly born in the Canal Zone.   :o 8-)

Charlie


Why would a lawsuit have to be filed here??  START PRINTPAGEMultimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!!  You need to Login or RegisterEND PRINTPAGE


Seems like this clown would need some sort of evidence to file a lawsuit since the birth certificate is posted online.

Either way, it would be interesting if Obama claimed citizenship of another country at any point of his life but the chance of that being true is slimmer than slim.

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Brew on Oct 23rd, 2008 at 12:07pm
Arial typeface? In 1961?

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by George_J on Oct 23rd, 2008 at 1:39pm
See:

START PRINTPAGEMultimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!!  You need to Login or RegisterEND PRINTPAGE

Particularly interesting is the fact that his birth announcement is present in archived copies of the "Honolulu Advertiser".  

Best,

George

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by fubar on Oct 23rd, 2008 at 1:57pm
Factcheck.org tries to look unbiased.  Ironically,


Quote:
The fact is, the ANNENBERG Public Policy Center (APPC), the sponsoring agency behind FastCheck.org, is itself supported by the same foundation, the ANNENBERG FOUNDATION, that Bill Ayers secured the 49.2 million dollars from to create the Chicago ANNENBERG Challenge “philanthropic” organization in which Barack Obama was the founding Chairman of the Board for and Ayers served as the grant writer of and co-Chair of for its two operating arms.


I don't care if Barack is from Mars... my problem with him is he is a liar who refuses to address any of the legitimate questions being asked about his policies, and he is selling the American voter a bill of goods, and the average American voter is dumb enough to believe the shit he is slinging.  But hey, I guess that makes me a hater and a racist.

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by FramCire on Oct 23rd, 2008 at 1:57pm

wrote on Oct 23rd, 2008 at 12:07pm:
Arial typeface? In 1961?



The certificate was probably printed mush more recently.  Not many people have copied of their birth certificate hanging around (at least those over the age of 30)


Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by catlind on Oct 23rd, 2008 at 2:16pm
I have mine and can produce it readily.  I also have my seal copies of marriage and divorce certificates, as well as my passport etc.

I keep it all in a fire safe box that is commonly known as the life in a bag.

I'm over 30, does that make me an oddity?  I learned to do just that from my parents, and their parents, whose birth certificates (of those who have passed) we still have.

Clark also has all his documents, as well as his parents (both passed) birth certificates and death certificates.

I always thought it a sort of personal responsibility thing, make sure you have your papers in order, no matter what happens, the hell with the clean underwear ;)

Cat

eta:
And if I had access to millions of dollars to run ads on TV, I sure as hell would be able to send the required fee to have a sealed copy of my birth certificate, or any other certificate, produced for anyone who wanted to see it should I be in a position of coveting the lovely white house in DC.


Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by monty on Oct 23rd, 2008 at 2:21pm
I suspect that Berg's case against Obama will get as far as the case he filed against Bush and Cheney for planning and carrying out 9/11.

But he did have some good evidence ... like the fact that the English version of Wikipedia had a slightly different account of Obama's early life than the Italian version of Wikipedia - if that's not proof of something, then what is??

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Jonny on Oct 23rd, 2008 at 8:32pm
START PRINTPAGEMultimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!!  You need to Login or RegisterEND PRINTPAGE

ETA:.....LOL...I found it!

START PRINTPAGEMultimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!!  You need to Login or RegisterEND PRINTPAGE

Those lawyers he hired to stop the search couldnt stop me.....LOL  :D

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Jonny on Oct 23rd, 2008 at 8:47pm
Please Email FactCheck.org with these questions:

1. Why are they referring to a certificate of live birth as a "Birth Certificate".

2. Is this the short form or long form birth certificate?

3. If this is the short form, then where is the long form. (They quote the Obama campaign as saying they requested all the documents available).

4. Why didn't Barack Obama have a copy of his birth certificate before 2007?

5. Has Obama ever been required to produce a birth certificate prior to 2008?

Email address is: Editor@FactCheck.org

NEXT:

At the bottom of factcheck.org it says clearly "The Annenberg Public Policy Center.

Obama AND Ayers sat on their board. Factcheck.org is an Anenberg group that is directly related to Obama. ;)


Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Charlie on Oct 23rd, 2008 at 10:50pm
Sadly........and it's stunning....it turns out that the biggest lie comes from John McCain when he says that he's confident that Palin is qualified. It's killing his campaign.....at the moment. We'll see after her deposition

Charlie

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by fubar on Oct 23rd, 2008 at 11:56pm

Charlie wrote on Oct 23rd, 2008 at 10:50pm:
Sadly........and it's stunning....it turns out that the biggest lie comes from John McCain when he says that he's confident that Palin is qualified. It's killing his campaign.....at the moment. We'll see after her deposition

Charlie


That was a perfectly Obama reply

1) Has nothing to do with the question at all
2) Tries to misdirect the attention to some other BS

Charlie, you gotta get some new kool-aid.

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Charlie on Oct 24th, 2008 at 12:14am
We will really dodge a bullet if Obama wins as with McCain's health history, Palin might become a President even more incompetent that Bush...and that's saying something.....probably nicer but horribly inept according to a lot of Republicans.

Charlie

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by fubar on Oct 24th, 2008 at 12:23am

Charlie wrote on Oct 24th, 2008 at 12:14am:
We will really dodge a bullet if Obama wins as with McCain's health history, Palin might become a President even more incompetent that Bush...and that's saying something.....probably nicer but horribly inept according to a lot of Republicans.

Charlie


Still not related to the question, and still misdirecting.  This is exactly what you get from any and every pro-Obama person that is asked anything about Obama...

Seriously, watch any channel, PBS, ABC, FOX, MSNBC... doesn't matter.  Listen to ANY Obama supporter.   Find me any one of them that oesn't simply recite talking points.  Find me ONE that answers a single question about Obama.

This is the strategy, and it will work.

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Callico on Oct 24th, 2008 at 12:25am

Charlie wrote on Oct 24th, 2008 at 12:14am:
We will really dodge a bullet if Obama wins as with McCain's health history, Palin might become a President even more incompetent that Bush...and that's saying something.....probably nicer but horribly inept according to a lot of Republicans.

Charlie



Charlie, my friend, ( and I do consider you a very valued friend) why do you have such hatred for Bush?  Every time something comes up of a political nature you can be counted on to demonstrate a kneejerk polemic against George Bush.

You say Palin is"probably nicer but horribly inept according to a lot of Republicans."  Please define a "lot".  I know a "lot" of republicans, and even quite a few (few being defined by Webster as "more than one or two, but not many") democrats who hold her in high regard.

It is time to quit the empty political buzz words and be substantive.

Jerry

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by fubar on Oct 24th, 2008 at 3:18am
Now the same 'loon' says he has a tape of the grandma admitting Obama was born in Kenya.  He says he is going to release the tape in a couple of days.  I guess this was on Savage Nation, although I didn't hear it.  I kind of doubt the tape exists, since he would have produced that right away.  I can't think of any legitimate reason to withhold it at all if he really has it.

Anyway... should make it interesting if a tape like that comes out.

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by BarbaraD on Oct 24th, 2008 at 6:36am
They've had 2 years to find out where BOTH candidates were born and IF they were qualified to run for President. They've both been PROVEN to have been born in the RIGHT places to be elgible (there was some questions about McCain being born in Panama, but that was quashed almost two years ago). It's a dead horse at this late date!

Hugs BD

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Charlie on Oct 24th, 2008 at 12:17pm
Barb is right. The idea that the DNC or the RNC would let something like that slip by is absurd.

Also; nothing like relying on Savage for objective journalism. If you're asking if I believe that most media favors Obama; absolutey. If the reasons aren't obvious, you need help. The biggest is that it's one helluva story. They liked the old McCain, not the thing he has been running as. The press always favor Democrats since McCarthy. and of course Nixon.

Why do I hate Bush? Torture, Constitution shredding, domestic surveillence, appointments by religious litmus tests and of course the moronic statement of his: "The jury is still out on evolution." Thiat in itself may not be enough but it says a lot about him and his disdain for science which he displays every day. Never in my life did I believe that an American President would would ctually say that about evolution. It's stunning.

More to come of course.

Charlie

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by fubar on Oct 24th, 2008 at 12:49pm
Yeah, I guess any question that hasn't been answered yet (like, oh all of them) is off limts now because they haven't got answers yet?  That's a great strategy there.

Obama tactic #1, attack the messenger.   ::)

Obama tactic #2, don't forget to mention how much you hate Bush

Obama tactic #3, if the enemy is on to anything substantive, bring up something stupid Bush did that has fuckall to do with the question

Got your bases covered Charlie.  Good robot.

Since I don't listen to, and didn't hear the Savage report, I can't be accused of 'relying' on him for objective journalism.

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Jonny on Oct 24th, 2008 at 9:30pm
The world is going to end....LOL  :D

START PRINTPAGEMultimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!!  You need to Login or RegisterEND PRINTPAGE

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by ccbiggsoo7 on Oct 29th, 2008 at 1:03am
Amen Brother! Sad but true!

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Kirk on Oct 29th, 2008 at 4:10am
  OK since his birth certificate shows that his father is a Muslim, By Muslim law that makes him a Muslim. Doesn't matter that he is now a Buddhist. Under Muslim law, and custom that makes him an apostate. Which means if he becomes a head of state, he must be killed. His representatives can not be dealt with. Or be given any standing, in any negotiations. Of any kind. This is the law in Saudi Arabia, Iran, Yemen, Pakistan, Afganistan, Syria, etc. As well as the Hamas and other organizations. If you think raising up an apostate to the level of head of state of the great Satan, is not going to put a serious burr under the hair shirt of the Mullahs in the Muslim countries. You haven't been paying attention. These are the same clowns that make suicide bombings an art form. That flew planes into two of our tallest buildings in New York. And think that burning and then hanging American civilians from bridges is great fun.
  The fact that Mr. Obama is pulling one of the biggest snow jobs on the American public in history to get himself elected is almost beside the point compared to that.
  If the man had any sense of decency, he would have bowed out of the campaign long ago. He spent his formative years in a Muslim country. He knows how they think. He didn't go to American schools until later in his childhood.
   You just can't trust politicians.

[smiley=smokin.gif]

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Audre on Oct 29th, 2008 at 6:26am
Being head of state has nothing to do with it, he'd be an apostate and "must be killed", president or not.  His representatives have nothing to do with him in that regard either.  Apostate killings actually aren't practiced much any more, especially ones in other countries.

"Obama’s conversion to another faith, in short, makes him a murtadd.

That said, the punishment for childhood apostasy is less severe than for the adult version. As Robert Spencer points out, “according to Islamic law an apostate male is not to be put to death if he has not reached puberty (cf. ‘Umdat al-Salik o8.2; Hidayah vol. II p. 246). Some, however, hold that he should be imprisoned until he is of age and then ‘invited’ to accept Islam, but officially the death penalty for youthful apostates is ruled out.”

On the positive side, were Obama prominently charged with apostasy, that would uniquely raise the issue of a Muslim’s right to change religion, taking a topic on the perpetual back-burner and placing it front and center, perhaps to the great future benefit of those Muslims who seek to declare themselves atheists or to convert to another religion.

But would Muslims seeing Obama as a murtadd significantly affect an Obama presidency? The only precedent to judge by is that of Carlos Saúl Menem, the president of Argentina from 1989 to 1999. The son of two Muslim Syrian immigrants and husband of another Syrian-Argentine, Zulema Fátima Yoma, Menem converted to Roman Catholicism. His wife said publicly that Menem left Islam for political reasons—because Argentinean law until 1994 required the president of the country to be a member of the Church. From a Muslim point of view, NYT 8 Jan 89Menem’s conversion is worse than Obama’s, having been done as an adult. Nonetheless, Menem was not threatened or otherwise made to pay a price for his change of religion, even during his trips to majority-Muslim countries, Syria in particular.

It is one thing to be president of Argentina in the 1990s, however, and another to be president of the United States in 2009. One must assume that some Islamists would renounce him as a murtadd and would try to execute him. Given the protective bubble surrounding an American president, though, this threat presumably would not make much difference to his carrying out his duties."

"So is Obama under a death sentence? Probably not. As far as I know Obama has never explained when he left Islam and became a Christian. This is a crucial point, for according to Islamic law an apostate male is not to be put to death if he has not reached puberty (cf. 'Umdat al-Salik o8.2; Hidayah vol. II p. 246). Some, however, hold that he should be imprisoned until he is of age and then "invited" to accept Islam, but officially the death penalty for youthful apostates is ruled out.

There are several ways this could go with Obama. Fjordman writes, "This is a golden opportunity for American anti-Jihadis to expose the intolerance inherent to Islamic teachings. And it is even better that it is a man from the black community and the political Left, where Muslims find many of their sympathizers."

That is true -- it is an opportunity to call attention to this aspect of Islam that so many are so eager to cover up. However, I think that Obama's candidacy and religious history are more likely to work to the advantage of the Left and the jihadists, even if he flames out a la Howard Dean in 2004. For if the Islamic death penalty for apostasy is even allowed to come up in the mainstream media, smiling Islamic spokesmen will deny that Islam teaches this. They can even be honest and simply affirm that it doesn't apply to Obama at all, since he left Islam while still very young.

I believe it is most likely that the media and Obama's campaign will ignore the apostasy law altogether, and tar anyone who brings it up as a "bigot." The propagandists of CAIR, MPAC et al are quite savvy at portraying themselves as victims in response to presentations of uncomfortable aspects of Islam. And it is virtually inconceivable that there will be protests in the Islamic world over his apostasy, calls for his execution, etc. Remember that the Cartoon Rage and Pope Rage riots were orchestrated from above. The people who orchestrated them know enough not to shoot themselves in the foot. They (as well as Obama's campaign) have a chance here to portray Obama as someone who was raised as a Muslim and thus has a keen understanding of the Islamic world and the Islamic mind -- rather like the positioning of Bill Clinton as our "first black President." Given Obama's politics, it will not be hard to present him internationally as someone who understands Islam and Muslims, and thus will be able to smooth over the hostility between the Islamic world and the West. Muslim leaders worldwide will not be saying, "He was raised a Muslim. Isn't that terrible?" Rather, I suspect that both Obama's campaign and Muslim leaders worldwide will say, "He was raised a Muslim. Isn't that wonderful? At last, someone who can see our point of view.""

"These same clowns that make suicide bombings an art form" are only a small radical part of it, just like there are radicals in any group or religion.  To portray every Muslim as a suicide bomber is ignorant.  

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Bob P on Oct 29th, 2008 at 7:09am

Quote:
"The jury is still out on evolution."

I believe God has done a fine job of directing the evolution of species.

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Kevin_M on Oct 29th, 2008 at 7:54am

Bob P wrote on Oct 29th, 2008 at 7:09am:

Quote:
"The jury is still out on evolution."

I believe God has done a fine job of directing the evolution of species.


Man then seems to have somehow acquired a skill of God, through observing the mechanism of natural selection, directing the evolution of plants, fruitflies, bacteria, etc., if that is a skill of God rather than done by a process of natural selection.  Hard to believe.

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Bob P on Oct 29th, 2008 at 8:30am

Quote:
Man then seems to have somehow acquired a skill of God, through observing the mechanism of natural selection, directing the evolution of plants, fruitflies, bacteria, etc., if that is a skill of God rather than done by a process of natural selection.  Hard to believe.

Created in His image.

God has given us lots of talents.

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Kevin_M on Oct 29th, 2008 at 8:56am

Bob P wrote on Oct 29th, 2008 at 8:30am:
God has given us lots of talents.


Of that appears the ability to see what does not require his hand.

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by George_J on Oct 29th, 2008 at 9:00am
It probably won't make much difference in this free-range thread, but getting back to the original point, Berg's lawsuit was dismissed by a federal judge in Philadelphia:

START PRINTPAGEMultimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!!  You need to Login or RegisterEND PRINTPAGE

Best,

George


Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by monty on Oct 29th, 2008 at 10:34am
The court found the allegations were "ridiculous" and "patently false" but you are right - that probably won't change anything for the people that think that Obama is a non-citizen marxist islamic terrorist loving sleeper cell agent or possibly the antichrist.  Doesn't matter for Joe the Plumber, who is now preaching that a vote for Obama is a vote for the destruction of Israel ... 3/4 of the Jewish citizens in this country support Obama, but Joe has found secret conspiracy evidence that he can't reveal (but which is available on the internet if people would only go look for it) ... innuendo, smears and hyperbole are all the right wing has left. It won't work, but it will help the Republican party self-destruct.

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Bob P on Oct 29th, 2008 at 11:04am

Quote:
The Los Angeles Times is refusing to release a videotape that it says shows Barack Obama praising a Chicago professor who was an alleged mouthpiece for the Palestine Liberation Organization while it was a designated terrorist group in the 1970s and '80s.

According an LA Times article written by Peter Wallsten in April, Obama was a "friend and frequent dinner companion" of Rashid Khalidi, who from 1976 to1982 was reportedly a director of the official Palestinian press agency, WAFA, which was operating in exile from Beirut with the PLO.

In the article -- based on the videotape obtained by the Times -- Wallsten said Obama addressed an audience during a 2003 farewell dinner for Khalidi, who was Obama's colleague at the University of Chicago, before his departure for Columbia University in New York. Obama said his many talks with Khalidi and his wife Mona stood as "consistent reminders to me of my own blind spots and my own biases."

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by FramCire on Oct 29th, 2008 at 11:10am

monty wrote on Oct 29th, 2008 at 10:34am:
The court found the allegations were "ridiculous" and "patently false" but you are right - that probably won't change anything for the people that think that Obama is a non-citizen marxist islamic terrorist loving sleeper cell agent or possibly the antichrist.  Doesn't matter for Joe the Plumber, who is now preaching that a vote for Obama is a vote for the destruction of Israel ... 3/4 of the Jewish citizens in this country support Obama, but Joe has found secret conspiracy evidence that he can't reveal (but which is available on the internet if people would only go look for it) ... innuendo, smears and hyperbole are all the right wing has left. It won't work, but it will help the Republican party self-destruct.


The court did not say that.  The DNC and Obama said that.

" Obama and the Democratic National Committee had asked Surrick to dismiss Berg's complaint in a court filing on Sept. 24.

They said that Berg's claims were "ridiculous" and "patently false," that Berg had "no standing" to challenge the qualifications of a candidate for president because he had not shown the requisite harm to himself."

The court said this:

"Surrick agreed.

In a 34-page memorandum and opinion, the judge said Berg's allegations of harm were "too vague and too attenuated" to confer standing on him or any other voters"




So basically, instead of forcing Obama's lawyers to prove their documents were authentic, the judge threw it out saying Berg had not proved injury to himself or others.  I believe this ruling to be the correct one, but nowhere does the court find that his claim that Obama was born outside the US is incorrect.  The judge didn't believe he had grounds to file the suit.  



3/4 of Jewish people support Obama (Gallop has it at 74%) yet the vast majority of absentee ballots from Israel have come in for McCain (as reported on my local news).   Isn't that interesting.  I guess our military and others in Israel support McCain.


Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by BarbaraD on Oct 29th, 2008 at 11:14am
While realizing I'm only a wimminz, I do have a MRI proving that I have a brain and I think that if this video really DID exist it would be plastered all over 24/7 TV coverage by now.

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by George_J on Oct 29th, 2008 at 11:26am

Bob P wrote on Oct 29th, 2008 at 11:04am:

Quote:
The Los Angeles Times is refusing to release a videotape that it says shows Barack Obama praising a Chicago professor who was an alleged mouthpiece for the Palestine Liberation Organization while it was a designated terrorist group in the 1970s and '80s.

According an LA Times article written by Peter Wallsten in April, Obama was a "friend and frequent dinner companion" of Rashid Khalidi, who from 1976 to1982 was reportedly a director of the official Palestinian press agency, WAFA, which was operating in exile from Beirut with the PLO.

In the article -- based on the videotape obtained by the Times -- Wallsten said Obama addressed an audience during a 2003 farewell dinner for Khalidi, who was Obama's colleague at the University of Chicago, before his departure for Columbia University in New York. Obama said his many talks with Khalidi and his wife Mona stood as "consistent reminders to me of my own blind spots and my own biases."


Probably a non-starter.  

This from the Huffington Post (yeah, yeah...I know--consider the source).

START PRINTPAGEMultimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!!  You need to Login or RegisterEND PRINTPAGE  

Hasn't hit the MSM yet, but no doubt it will if the McCain campaign decides to push this one.  Which I doubt.

Best,

George

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Jonny on Oct 29th, 2008 at 4:16pm

Bob P wrote on Oct 29th, 2008 at 11:04am:

Quote:
The Los Angeles Times is refusing to release a videotape that it says shows Barack Obama praising a Chicago professor who was an alleged mouthpiece for the Palestine Liberation Organization while it was a designated terrorist group in the 1970s and '80s.

According an LA Times article written by Peter Wallsten in April, Obama was a "friend and frequent dinner companion" of Rashid Khalidi, who from 1976 to1982 was reportedly a director of the official Palestinian press agency, WAFA, which was operating in exile from Beirut with the PLO.

In the article -- based on the videotape obtained by the Times -- Wallsten said Obama addressed an audience during a 2003 farewell dinner for Khalidi, who was Obama's colleague at the University of Chicago, before his departure for Columbia University in New York. Obama said his many talks with Khalidi and his wife Mona stood as "consistent reminders to me of my own blind spots and my own biases."


Just a side note....William Ayres was also at that dinner!  ;)

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by monty on Oct 30th, 2008 at 9:32am

Quote:
According an LA Times article written by Peter Wallsten in April, Obama was a "friend and frequent dinner companion" of Rashid Khalidi, who from 1976 to1982 was reportedly a director of the official Palestinian press agency, WAFA, which was operating in exile from Beirut with the PLO.


Was that the same Rashid Khalidi that McCain's group gave half a million dollars to?


Quote:
During the 1990s, while he served as chairman of the International Republican Institute (IRI), McCain distributed several grants to the Palestinian research center co-founded by Khalidi, including one worth half a million dollars.

A 1998 tax filing for the McCain-led group shows a $448,873 grant to Khalidi's Center for Palestine Research and Studies for work in the West Bank. (See grant number 5180, "West Bank: CPRS" on page 14 of this PDF.)

The relationship extends back as far as 1993, when John McCain joined IRI as chairman in January. Foreign Affairs noted in September of that year that IRI had helped fund several extensive studies in Palestine run by Khalidi's group, including over 30 public opinion polls and a study of "sociopolitical attitudes."


Oops .. the Rashid Khalidi boogey man they are trying to create got far more love from McCain than Obama.  

Team McCain. Dishonest. Dishonorable.


Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Rolomatic on Oct 30th, 2008 at 9:55am

monty wrote on Oct 30th, 2008 at 9:32am:
Team McCain. Dishonest. Dishonorable.


If you can call McCain dishonorable than I can call Obama a closet Muslim extremist!

Monty is so left leaning that he is swimming in the Pacific Ocean with a pack of kool aid.

Obama’s foreign policy will be likened to all his covert meetings with terrorists and crooks in Chicago. He will be uttering God dam America when he comes out of his socialist closet.

Rolo.. :P

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Bob P on Oct 30th, 2008 at 9:57am

Quote:
Oops .. the Rashid Khalidi boogey man they are trying to create got far more love from McCain than Obama.  

Team McCain. Dishonest. Dishonorable.


Quoting the Huffington Post is worse than quoting Faux News.

The IRI was trying to help resolve the Palestinian conflict with the grant.  Obama was just adding another terrorist buddy to his already large stable of the same.


Quote:
IRI Statement Regarding Work with Palestinians

For Immediate Release
October 29, 2008


Washington, DC – “Questions have arisen regarding the International Republican Institute’s (IRI) work with Palestinians in the 1990s.

“In the 1990s, IRI gave grants to the Center for Palestinian Research and Studies (CPRS) for polling in the West Bank/Gaza. The polls measured support for the peace process, for various Palestinian political groups, and for efforts to enhance governance in the West Bank/Gaza. At that time no other organization could credibly conduct polling in the West Bank/Gaza.

“We understand that Rashid Khalidi was one of the many founders of CPRS, and we understand that he was for some (unclear) amount of time a board member. IRI did not in the 1990s conduct background checks of grantees’ founders or board members. IRI did on a number of occasions vet CPRS as an organization, including, as was our custom, with the Israeli government, and we were given no cause for concern.

“We do not recall any contact between Mr. Khalidi and IRI, and there is no evidence that Mr. Khalidi benefited in any way from IRI's grants.

“Other organizations that reportedly gave funding to CPRS include the National Endowment for Democracy, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Center for International Private Enterprise, the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations, the Japanese Embassy, and Germany’s Friedrich Naumann Stiftung.

“IRI’s relationship with CPRS ended in 2000, and we understand that it no longer exists.”

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by George_J on Oct 30th, 2008 at 10:28am
For an Israeli perspective (and I'm pretty sure the Israelis are watching this with some interest) on the Khalidi kerfluffle, please consider this article in the right-leaning Jerusalem Post.  In general, the Jerusalem post is distinctly cool on Obama, but I thought that its treatment of the subject was remarkably even-handed.

START PRINTPAGEMultimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!!  You need to Login or RegisterEND PRINTPAGE

Best,

George

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by BarbaraD on Oct 30th, 2008 at 1:06pm
Ok, I've got a question here (and this may be a little off topic, but...). And I'm not trying to stir up anything - I just want something explained to me that I've never understood long before now.

I know we've got a lot of Jewish Americans here, but WHY is our country so Pro-Israel? I've studied some Jewish history (not a whole lot but some) and Israel has been around for thousands of years and has always survived whatever's been thrown at them and they've always been surrounded by Arabs. Their country is one of the most organized ones in the mid-east - bar none. they should be giving US lessons.  But I've just never understood why we think we have to defend them in everything. And I'm not pro or anti anything except curious.

I personally don't think we'll ever see peace in the middle east in our lifetime (it hasn't happened in the last 2000 years), so why in the world are we so worried about it? And I'm not talking about 9-11 (yes I think we should find Bin Laudin and hang that sob and all his friends), but to condem every person of Arab descent for this is just not right either.

Please don't come back with terrorists being a threat or stuff like that - I just want an answer to a question that I can't figure out for myself. I'm sure there's a reason - I just don't know it.

Hugs BD

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Bob P on Oct 30th, 2008 at 1:27pm
Democracy

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Charlie on Oct 30th, 2008 at 6:46pm

Quote:
While realizing I'm only a wimminz, I do have a MRI proving that I have a brain and I think that if this video really DID exist it would be plastered all over 24/7 TV coverage by now.


Oh it exists and the Los Angeles Times has refused to release it although if it were a real blockbuster, McCain and especially, Barbie, would blast it all over the place every ten minutes.

Once again, give the RNC some credit.

Charlie

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Jonny on Oct 30th, 2008 at 7:01pm

Charlie wrote on Oct 30th, 2008 at 6:46pm:
Oh it exists and the Los Angeles Times has refused to release it although if it were a real blockbuster, McCain and especially, Barbie, would blast it all over the place every ten minutes.


Its to bad you cant see video Charlie (like Fubar said) or I would put up at least five videos of McCain and Barbie blasting them for not releasing it!

Like Shawn said, you know only half of the story when you cant see it all!  ;)

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Charlie on Oct 30th, 2008 at 7:45pm
Yeah but that it isn't being used by McCain in ads.

Get serious. The RNC isn't comprised of wimps and McCain would be rattling it all over the place at every rally....if the RNC thought it useful. Too much at stake here.

Charlie

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Jonny on Oct 30th, 2008 at 7:52pm

Charlie wrote on Oct 30th, 2008 at 7:45pm:
Yeah but that it isn't being used by McCain in ads.

Get serious. The RNC isn't comprised of wimps and McCain would be rattling it all over the place at every rally....if the RNC thought it useful. Too much at stake here.

Charlie


Like I said, you cant see video so I wont waste my time posting them. :-*

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Bob P on Oct 31st, 2008 at 4:39pm
You selfish bastards!

START PRINTPAGEMultimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!!  You need to Login or RegisterEND PRINTPAGE

I guess these guys know who skratches their back:

START PRINTPAGEMultimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!!  You need to Login or RegisterEND PRINTPAGE

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by superhawk2300 on Oct 31st, 2008 at 5:46pm

Quote:
This is the strategy, and it will work.


It worked for Bush!

What AWOL?
What cocaine?
What DUI?
What WMDs?
What Kenith Lay?
What energy policy I campaigned on?

Funny thing is if he would have gotten his way social security would have been privatized and now, with Wall Street in the tank millions of people would be living in the streets. No one is beating THAT drum anymore, but if it would have won out it would have been:
What Social Security?

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Jonny on Oct 31st, 2008 at 6:06pm
Gee, I didnt know Bush was running for a third term.  :D

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Jonny on Oct 31st, 2008 at 6:26pm
Heres some SPIN....and heres some FACTS! ;)

START PRINTPAGEMultimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!!  You need to Login or RegisterEND PRINTPAGE


Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by FramCire on Oct 31st, 2008 at 7:19pm
"Obama recently acknowledged — although not in his commercial — that: "The next president will have to scale back his agenda and some of his proposals."  "

So Obama is now saying that he knows he wont be able to deliver on his agenda.  Isn't he saying that he is lying when he presents an agenda he ALREADY knows he wont deliver on.

To me, it's scary that a guy can actually say one thing and the same day say he knows he wont be able to deliver.  And this is from the guy who SHOULD have congress on his side.  To me a guy who promises things that he KNOWINGLY cant deliver despite congressional majority support is frightening.

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Charlie on Oct 31st, 2008 at 9:38pm
I agree with whomever said that because of the economic mess we are in; whoever wins, loses.

Charlie

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Jonny on Oct 31st, 2008 at 9:45pm
Out of the mouth of the wife.....LOL  ;D

START PRINTPAGEMultimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!!  You need to Login or RegisterEND PRINTPAGE

For Charlie: Obamas wife says "Its way too soon, he hasnt done any thing yet".....LOL  :D (On the question of running for president)

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by Jonny on Nov 1st, 2008 at 5:24pm
The teleprompter died.....So much for "The one"

START PRINTPAGEMultimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!!  You need to Login or RegisterEND PRINTPAGE

How much will it cost?......and why cant you hear yourself?

How much will it cost?

Title: Re: Obama Lawsuit
Post by FramCire on Nov 1st, 2008 at 5:49pm

wrote on Oct 31st, 2008 at 9:45pm:
Out of the mouth of the wife.....LOL  ;D

START PRINTPAGEMultimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!!  You need to Login or RegisterEND PRINTPAGE

For Charlie: Obamas wife says "Its way too soon, he hasnt done any thing yet".....LOL  :D (On the question of running for president)



Mccains people need to put out ads with this clip and the ones with Biden and clinton saying Obama isnt ready to be President.

If Obama uses Mccains economy clip and 90% clip, why wont McCains people use these??

New CH.com Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.4!
YaBB © 2000-2009. All Rights Reserved.