New CH.com Forum | |
http://www.clusterheadaches.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl
Daily Chat >> General Posts >> Christchurch, NZ earthquake http://www.clusterheadaches.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1283555490 Message started by Mike NZ on Sep 3rd, 2010 at 7:11pm |
Title: Re: Christchurch, NZ earthquake Post by Callico on Sep 3rd, 2010 at 8:01pm
Glad you are OK! Watching to see what is happening.
Jerry |
Title: Re: Christchurch, NZ earthquake Post by QnHeartMM on Sep 3rd, 2010 at 8:29pm
Glad to hear the news is good. 7.2 is a big shake.
|
Title: Re: Christchurch, NZ earthquake Post by Guiseppi on Sep 3rd, 2010 at 8:53pm
Damn a 7.2 is huge! Glad to hear thus far it's good news.
Joe.....a southern California boy who KNOWS his earthquakes! |
Title: Re: Christchurch, NZ earthquake Post by Charlie on Sep 3rd, 2010 at 9:01pm
Yikes! What a mess. Thanks for the link.
Glad you're all right. Charlie |
Title: Re: Christchurch, NZ earthquake Post by George on Sep 4th, 2010 at 8:41am
Glad to hear you're okay. Hoping more of our NZ members check in soon.
That's a nasty one. Best wishes, George |
Title: Re: Christchurch, NZ earthquake Post by Mike NZ on Sep 4th, 2010 at 4:54pm
It's incredible looking at the damage, with parts of central Christchurch looking more like a set on a war movie. But the most amazing thing is that there were no fatalities and only two serious injuries reported. For an earthquake of this size, a shallow earthquake (7 miles) with an epicentre under 20 miles from a city of about 400,000 people it is a huge escape.
However about 20% of houses are uninhabitable, 5% of commercial buildings are badly damaged, 33% of people are without water, 10% without power (it's the end of winter and it gets pretty cold). For other NZ members in the area they might not be able to check in as there are problems with phone lines, internet access, etc. The only fatalities in the area was when a sightseeing / skydiving plane crashed on take-off about 50 miles away killing 9 people, which is NZ's worst plane crash in over 15 years. For the faults in the South Island there has been a 7.5 - 8 earthquake every 300 years and it's been over 300 years since the last one, so the predictions are that it's pretty likely there will be a much bigger one in the next 50 years. When that comes I doubt we'll be so lucky. |
Title: Re: Christchurch, NZ earthquake Post by Linda_Howell on Sep 4th, 2010 at 5:51pm
As another Californian who knows personally about earthquakes, I have to say that no fatalities from a 7.1 is amazing.!!!!!
After clicking on your links I started doing some research on your country because I know very little of New Zealand. Wow...I am amazed at how beautiful it is, the culture and history behind it, very little crime, and the diversity. You live in a wonderful place Mike. Linda |
Title: Re: Christchurch, NZ earthquake Post by deltadarlin on Sep 4th, 2010 at 7:11pm
I have never been in an earthquake and do not have intentions of going to places where the ground shakes.
BUT, since you've had your 300 year *shake*, I'd love to visit the country, it's a photographers dream. |
Title: Re: Christchurch, NZ earthquake Post by Kate in Oz on Sep 4th, 2010 at 8:44pm
Hey Mike,
So pleased to hear that you are ok!! Saw some photos in the paper - unbelievable. We've just had a weekend of flooding over here (Vic) crazy stuff. Take it easy, Kate |
Title: Re: Christchurch, NZ earthquake Post by catlind on Sep 5th, 2010 at 7:55am
So, being lazy and not wanting to look up a map *blush* where is Balclutha in relation to Christchurch?
I have a friend lives there, I also have family living in NZ and AU but not certain of current addresses. Cat |
Title: Re: Christchurch, NZ earthquake Post by Mosaicwench on Sep 5th, 2010 at 9:10am
Damn, another place off the retirement destinations list.
Glad all is reasonably well. |
Title: Re: Christchurch, NZ earthquake Post by Mike NZ on Sep 5th, 2010 at 2:51pm catlind wrote on Sep 5th, 2010 at 7:55am:
Balclutha is near the south west corner of the South Island and Christchurch if on the west coast of the South Island about half way down. The distance between them is about 250 miles so they will have felt the earthquake, but it will have been reduced in intensity at that distance and is unlikely to have caused any damage. Mosaicwench wrote on Sep 5th, 2010 at 9:10am:
The area will be good as new within a few years and it will benefit from a lot of spending with the older buildings and infrastructure that was damaged being replaced. And if you're in the building trade it will be a place where you'll have work coming out of your ears for quite some time! |
Title: Re: Christchurch, NZ earthquake Post by Mike NZ on Sep 6th, 2010 at 4:46pm
The scale of the damage is now being revealed from what was the stongest ever ground shaking ever recorded in NZ (although there having been stronger earthquakes) with this one producing forces 1.25 times the strength of gravity near the epicentre.
The movement resulted in a rupture on the surface 22km (13 miles) long with lateral movement of the surface of up to 4 metres. Of the 160,000 homes in the area over 100,000 need to be repaired with many only fit to be demolished. The people in the area were very, very lucky that despite all that nobody died. |
Title: Re: Christchurch, NZ earthquake Post by Charlie on Sep 6th, 2010 at 6:48pm |
Title: Re: Christchurch, NZ earthquake Post by Kevin_M on Sep 7th, 2010 at 7:21am Mike NZ wrote on Sep 6th, 2010 at 7:43pm:
Heck no. If life was unhurried enough to not pay more to fly around NZ while visiting, or to avoid being involved in congesting traffic, it's hard to imagine a better loooong train ride top to bottom and back a couple times. :) from Charlie's link: Quote:
Nice choice. ;) |
New CH.com Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.4! YaBB © 2000-2009. All Rights Reserved. |