New CH.com Forum | |
http://www.clusterheadaches.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl
Cluster Headache Help and Support >> Getting to Know Ya >> new, just diagnosed, question at end http://www.clusterheadaches.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1367589301 Message started by wendya432 on May 3rd, 2013 at 9:55am |
Title: new, just diagnosed, question at end Post by wendya432 on May 3rd, 2013 at 9:55am
Hi everyone. Glad to find this board! Although I have to say, wish we didn't have these darn things in common!!!
For a long time I've been under the impression I had trigeminal neuralgia. My rheumatologist suggested it, my GP agreed. I have some other neuro issues going on, so off to the neuro I went. He said it's just a headache, take some advil. yeah, because we all know that helps!!!! On to a new neurologist (mainly because first neuro said I had MS, then said I didn't and dismissed me, need to get to the bottom of this and find out if I do or do not have MS). Just saw new neuro the other day. He said it sounds like a cluster headache to him. Told me to go home and look it up and see if I agree, but he was pretty certain that I was "one of the rare women that get cluster headaches" (his words). And he put me on Topamax. My GP had been giving me Vicodin since the lyrica didn't work on them at all and made me almost suicidal. So I had been self medicating my pain with 800mg of ibuprofen and 500-1000 mg of vicodin as needed. With lots of shadowing that I was just dealing with (and had no idea it was shadowing until reading here! first neuro said atypical facial pain which I've come to understand means he thought I was crazy) So, here I am. Starting the topamax. Trying to ween off the vicodin. Which, didn't really take care of it, but between the motrin and vicodin it made it tolerable at least. One question I have. I know that these things seem to differ a little for everyone, but I haven't seen anyone mention this yet, although I haven't read everything here yet. One thing that really gets me, is that when they are bad, I feel like someone has rolled my eye in vicks and shoved vicks up my nose and then sent me out into a blizzard and then of course starts using an ice pick on my face. But, the sensation of that super horrible menthol-like cold, is just awful. I haven't found anything that helps. I just end up using my hand to shut my nostril and keep my eye shut. Does anyone else have this? Anything to help? |
Title: Re: new, just diagnosed, question at end Post by Guiseppi on May 6th, 2013 at 7:23pm
Welcome to the board Wendy, spend a little time here and you'll realize quickly that women are NOT much of a minority around here. For way too long, woman=migraine. As a result, many women spent even longer then the men did trying to get an accurate diagnosis when it WAS CH! You've been given some great advice already. As Bob mentions, if it is CH, it's a lifetime ailment, so the earlier you get a thorough workup and accurate diagnosis, the better.
PAY REAL CLOSE ATTENTION TO BATCH'S POST!!! His posts are long and technical, read them anyways! ;D I'm coming up on my 3rd year pain free, after well over 30 years of episodic CH. The only thing I changed was starting Batch's D-3 regimen. I went pain free and have stayed on it religiously. Glad you found us, hope we can help you. Joe |
Title: Re: new, just diagnosed, question at end Post by wendya432 on Jun 6th, 2013 at 10:18am
Haven't been here in a while. Honestly I was a little off put by the initial responses! Not really willing to share my location other than the US.
Trying to deal with this awful pain, along with other neurological problems, and then coming here and getting a bit overwhelmed, was well... overwhelming! But, I will say, the topomax was pure hell and I'm never taking it again. Stopped after a week and am back to just using my NSAID and vicodin. Not much help, but living through it. Waiting to go back to neuro in a few weeks. I will take the list of meds with me. If any preventative will make me feel like a zombie then I will stick with treating them as they come thank you very much. I guess that is why I've stuck with what I'm doing. I hated how I felt on lyrica, which didn't help much anyway, and now hated how I felt on topamax. D3 is normal. Was a touch low last year, but I'm on supplements and I'm back in a good range, well above normal, and continue to take my supplement daily. (2000 units in the am, plus 400 u in with my 400 mg of calcium, and a small amount in my daily multi vitamin as well.) Really, the cluster headaches have been on the back burner if you can believe it, because I'm more worried about if I am going to lose the ability to walk or not. (turns out I probably don't have MS, yay! but still have no idea what is wrong with me. boo!) Thank you for all the help and articles. I will start pouring over them and be ready when I go to my follow up. I believe he is a headache specialist. He was going to put me on a blood pressure med, but I tend to run low on a regular basis and we didn't want to run into any problems with that. Although I'm not sure why he went right to topamax since I have a history of kidney stones (12 at a time!) so hopefully we can find something else that works better with less side effects. |
Title: Re: new, just diagnosed, question at end Post by Hoppy on Jun 6th, 2013 at 6:48pm
Hi Wendy,
The reasan you get asked where in the US you live is so you can get a list of headache specialist's in your area. They are only trying to help you get the best outcome. |
Title: Re: new, just diagnosed, question at end Post by Guiseppi on Jun 6th, 2013 at 8:05pm
The blood pressure med was probably verapamil, the number one prevent of choice. Worth a quick read.
A widely used protocol. Your doc will recognize the source and author: Headache. 2004 Nov;44(10):1013-8. Individualizing treatment with verapamil for cluster headache patients. Blau JN, Engel HO. Background.-Verapamil is currently the best available prophylactic drug for patients experiencing cluster headaches (CHs). Published papers usually state 240 to 480 mg taken in three divided doses give good results, ranging from 50% to 80%; others mention higher doses-720, even 1200 mg per day. In clinical practice we found we needed to adapt dosage to individual's time of attacks, in particular giving higher doses before going to bed to suppress severe nocturnal episodes. A few only required 120 mg daily. We therefore evolved a scheme for steady and progressive drug increase until satisfactory control had been achieved. Objective.-To find the minimum dose of verapamil required to prevent episodic and chronic cluster headaches by supervising each individual and adjusting the dosage accordingly. Methods.-Consecutive patients with episodic or chronic CH (satisfying International Headache Society (IHS) criteria) were started on verapamil 40 mg in the morning, 80 mg early afternoon, and 80 mg before going to bed. Patients kept a diary of all attacks, recording times of onset, duration, and severity. They were advised, verbally and in writing, to add 40 mg verapamil on alternate days, depending on their attack timing: with nocturnal episodes the first increase was the evening dose and next the afternoon one; when attacks occurred on or soon after waking, we advised setting an alarm clock 2 hours before the usual waking time and then taking the medication. Patients were followed-up at weekly intervals until attacks were controlled. They were also reviewed when a cluster period had ended, and advised to continue on the same dose for a further 2 weeks before starting systematic reduction. Chronic cluster patients were reviewed as often as necessary. Results.-Seventy consecutive patients, 52 with episodic CH during cluster periods and 18 with chronic CH, were all treated with verapamil as above. Complete relief from headaches was obtained in 49 (94%) of 52 with episodic, and 10 (55%) of 18 with chronic CH; the majority needed 200 to 480 mg, but 9 in the episodic, and 3 in the chronic group, needed 520 to 960 mg for control. Ten, 2 in the episodic and 8 in the chronic group, with incomplete relief, required additional therapy-lithium, sumatriptan, or sodium valproate. One patient withdrew because verapamil made her too tired, another developed Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and the drug was withdrawn. Conclusions.-Providing the dosage for each individual is adequate, preventing CH with verapamil is highly effective, taken three (occasionally with higher doses, four) times a day. In the majority (94%) with episodic CH steady dose increase under supervision, totally suppressed attacks. However in the chronic variety only 55% were completely relieved, 69% men, but only 20% women. In both groups, for those with partial attack suppression, additional prophylactic drugs or acute treatment was necessary. (Headache 2004;44:1013-1018). ======================================= SLOW-RELEASE VERAPAMIL Dr. Sheftell applauded the protocol for verapamil used by Dr. Goadsby and colleagues, which entailed use of short-acting verapamil in increments of 80 mg. “This method was suggested by Lee Kudrow, MD, 20 years ago as an alternative to slow-release verapamil,” Dr. Sheftell noted. “I would agree with using short-acting verapamil, rather than the sustained-release formulation, in cluster headache,” he said. “I prefer the short-acting formulation with regard to ability to titrate more accurately and safely. My clinical experience anecdotally demonstrates improved responses when patients are switched from sustained-release verapamil to short-acting verapamil.” Dr. Goadsby agreed that his clinical experience was similar. “There are no well-controlled, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging studies to direct treatment. This is one of those areas where clinicians who treat cluster headache have to combine what modicum of evidence is available with their own clinical experience,” Dr. Sheftell commented Joe |
New CH.com Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.4! YaBB © 2000-2009. All Rights Reserved. |