New CH.com Forum | |
http://www.clusterheadaches.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl
Cluster Headache Help and Support >> Medications, Treatments, Therapies >> When is a CH not a CH? http://www.clusterheadaches.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1424642348 Message started by lancashire Lad on Feb 22nd, 2015 at 4:59pm |
Title: Re: When is a CH not a CH? Post by Bob Johnson on Feb 22nd, 2015 at 7:05pm
It's too late in the day to engage your whole message. See if this helps.....
=== Link to: cluster-LIKE headache: IN: "Medications, Treatments, Therapies --> "Important Topics" --> "Cluster-LIKE headache" |
Title: Re: When is a CH not a CH? Post by AussieBrian on Feb 22nd, 2015 at 8:41pm
A dysfunctional cervical spine is no more fanciful a trigger than is chocolate, perfume, alcohol or exercise. It can do no harm at all to have these joints manipulated to see if it helps.
It doesn't need to be the cause, nor the cure, and I truly wish you luck. Keep us informed. |
Title: Re: When is a CH not a CH? Post by lancashire Lad on Feb 23rd, 2015 at 6:38am
Thanks Bob and Brian
The idea of cluster-like headaches is a good way of compartmentalising things, obviously a tumour or aneurysm impacting on a nerve is clearly a candidate for a secondary cause. The primary headaches don't have known causes, when a previously diagnosed primary headache actually gets its cause(s) discovered they then are conveniently re-named and called a secondary HA. Although I did read in some literature recently where the term secondary primary headache arose to describe a headache that satisfied the rigorous diagnostic classification of a primary headache but the cause became known(ish) (somewhere in the neck) But I don't accept that something going on in the cervical spine that triggers a primary headache is in the same league as chocolate as a trigger. I accept that chocolate and its interactions with human kind is complex (and can make your skin younger!) but the cervical spine is something else. It's there to protect, amongst other things the brainstem (nestling between the spinal cord and the thalamus), itself a very complicated thing. It also allows movement of the head and connect the head to the rest of the body. Movement is permitted through a complex collaberation of joints, muscles, tendons fascia, shock absorbers and other stuff. If this protective sleeve becomes damaged (dysfunctional) it can have an impact on the brainstem and/or nerves either directly or via muscle contraction. One result, from one nerve impaction can result in a feeling of an icepick being driven through the head and out the eye; when this is identified as the cause of the pain it is called secondary, but when the same effect is created and the cause cannot be identified it is called primary. When the same nerve is impacted above the neck, in the head, the same pain reaction may result, this is then a neuro problem and chocolate may be legitimately blamed. That's the state of current understanding. |
Title: Re: When is a CH not a CH? Post by Bob Johnson on Feb 23rd, 2015 at 1:14pm
Interesting to note that he is saying that the primary mode of action is NOT as a vasoconstrictor but on its effect on the central nervous system. Doesn't change our appreciation of this class of meds but suggests we need to change how we think about the nature of CH.
============================== Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2007;(177):129-43. Serotonin receptor ligands: treatments of acute migraine and cluster headache. Goadsby PJ. Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK. peterg@ion.ucl.ac.uk Fuelled by the development of the serotonin 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonists, the triptans, the last 15 years has seen an explosion of interest in the treatment of acute migraine and cluster headache. Sumatriptan was the first of these agonists, and it launched a wave of therapeutic advances. These medicines are effective and safe. Triptans were developed as cranial vasoconstrictors to mimic the desirable effects of serotonin, while avoiding its side-effects. IT HAS SUBSEQUENTLY BEEN SHOWN THAT THE TRIPTANS' MAJOR ACTION IS NEURONAL, WITH BOTH PERIPHERAL AND CENTRAL TRIGEMINAL INHIBITORY EFFECTS, AS WELL AS ACTIONS IN THE THALAMUS AND AT CENTRAL MODULATORY SITES, SUCH AS THE PERIAQUEDUCTAL GREY MATTER. Further refinements may be possible as the 5-HT(1D) and 5-HT(1F) receptor agonists are explored. Serotonin receptor pharmacology has contributed much to the better management of patients with primary headache disorders. PMID: 17087122 [PubMed] ================================================================= J Clin Neurosci. 2010 Mar 11. What has functional neuroimaging done for primary headache ... and for the clinical neurologist? Sprenger T, Goadsby PJ. UCSF Headache Centre, Department of Neurology, University of California, 1701 Divisadero St, Suite 480, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA. Our understanding of mechanisms involved in primary headache syndromes has been substantially advanced using functional neuroimaging. THE DATA HAVE HELPED ESTABLISH THE NOW-PREVAILING VIEW OF PRIMARY HEADACHE SYNDROMES, SUCH AS MIGRAINE AND CLUSTER HEADACHE, AS BRAIN DISORDERS WITH NEUROVASCULAR MANIFESTATIONS, NOT AS DISORDERS OF BLOOD VESSELS. PMID: 20227279 [PubMed] |
Title: Re: When is a CH not a CH? Post by Potter on Feb 23rd, 2015 at 7:48pm
It's a wonky hypothalamus. Let's not over think it.
Potter |
Title: Re: When is a CH not a CH? Post by coach_bill on Feb 23rd, 2015 at 9:49pm
I think its a combo package. it could start with dental, or other knocks on the head. its also genes and if you stir all that together with a splash of that hypothingagiggy that potter just said, you get a nice big fat cluster.
Coach Bill |
Title: Re: When is a CH not a CH? Post by Hoppy on Feb 24th, 2015 at 12:15am
Having suffered from CH for 43yrs, and looked into the ins
and outs every which way to the cause of a typical CH, it all comes back to the Hypothalamus, which is unfortunate for the 1/1000 cluster heads, myself included. Headache types that mimic CH's, well that's another story, and yes, I've read many times about neck injury that cause headaches that mimic CH's, So, who knows, maybe a wonky spine fits into this category too, but Horton's Cephalalgia is a disease that us cluster heads have to live with throughout our lifetime. The condition was originally named Horton's Cephalalgia after Dr. B.T Horton. His original paper describes the severity of the headaches as being able to take normal men and force them to attempt or complete suicide. From Horton's 1939 paper on cluster headache. Hoppy. |
Title: Re: When is a CH not a CH? Post by lancashire Lad on Feb 24th, 2015 at 4:28am |
New CH.com Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.4! YaBB © 2000-2009. All Rights Reserved. |