New CH.com Forum | |
http://www.clusterheadaches.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl
Daily Chat >> General Posts >> Therapeutic party http://www.clusterheadaches.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1465590096 Message started by thierry on Jun 10th, 2016 at 4:21pm |
Title: Therapeutic party Post by thierry on Jun 10th, 2016 at 4:21pm |
Title: Re: Therapeutic party Post by AussieBrian on Jun 10th, 2016 at 7:06pm
And here I was ready to bring the beer!
|
Title: Re: Therapeutic party Post by Mike NZ on Jun 10th, 2016 at 10:00pm
Interesting research.
What is quite surprising is how many "mind altering" drugs seem to impact CH with the list including LSD, magic mushrooms and now cocaine. It would hardly be surprising if there were more that had a similar effect, although what is interesting is that whilst most seem to act as preventives, cocaine is used as an abortive. Then consider how probably the most consumed drug, alcohol, is a very common CH trigger and the incidence of CH in smokers is much higher than non-smokers. I wonder what else will be found that acts as a CH preventive / abortive / trigger. |
Title: Re: Therapeutic party Post by Hoppy on Jun 11th, 2016 at 5:53am
Mike NZ wrote, Then consider how probably the most consumed drug, alcohol, is a very common CH trigger and the incidence of CH in smokers is much higher than non-smokers.
From what I've read, cigarette smoking makes no difference if you smoke or not, but when it comes to a trigger in CH's! Second hand smoke can be a trigger in some folk. Hoppy |
Title: Re: Therapeutic party Post by BobG on Jun 11th, 2016 at 8:35am
The capital of the cluster world is the hypothalmus. The hypothalmus is also the capital of the habits and addictions. To me, it stands to reason that Clusterheads would score a higher percent of smokers than the general population.
For me, a smoker, smoking has no affect one way or other on my attacks. |
Title: Re: Therapeutic party Post by Callico on Jun 15th, 2016 at 11:37pm
Mike, with respect, I think that last study you referenced is totally bogus. I neither drink, smoke, nor do illicit drugs, yet I've had CH for well over 40 years, yet within my lifetime, I have been a close acquantance of hundreds of people who indulge/overindulge in one, two, or all three of them, and I'm the only clusterhead. With the epidemic of drug use we have had in the States since the 60's, based on that study, we should have a major enough issue with CH to demand the attention of every medical facility in the country, yet we can't even be administered oxygen when we go to the ER.
Perhaps your experiences are different in NZ. ::) Jerry |
Title: Re: Therapeutic party Post by AussieBrian on Jun 15th, 2016 at 11:53pm
Interestingly, Calico, I read the study exactly the opposite way round. Not that drug use leads to CH, rather that CH leads to drug use.
|
Title: Re: Therapeutic party Post by Mike NZ on Jun 16th, 2016 at 12:20am AussieBrian wrote on Jun 15th, 2016 at 11:53pm:
That is close to how I read it too. A damaged hypothalamus means we get CH but since the hypothalamus (as Bob pointed out) is also involved in addictions then it is unsurprising that there is a linkage between the two. What I suspect is in the paper (the bit you need to pay to access) is the statistical analysis that shows that the correlation between people with CH and drug use is greater than you would expect to see by chance. |
Title: Re: Therapeutic party Post by jon019 on Jun 16th, 2016 at 12:47am
Yup...I'm with Bob too...as Helen used to say...it's a wonky hypo-thingy...
I am always leery of studies...it takes a freaking expert to first understand WHAT they are saying....IF there is any validity...AND under what circumstances. Read a few overviews by Batch and you'll be very careful what you take from ANY of them.............. For instance...the cigarette smoke (direct/indirect) history of clusterheads. It is nearly pointless to correlate parent smoking to clusterheadness (new word ;) ) for my generation. My Father smoked...he was gone 6 yrs before I became a clusterhead...HOWEVER...even if he didn't..in my childhood...and even until recently...the number of smokers was much higher...and second hand smoke unregulated and everywhere. So I was exposed anyway...as were most baby boomers.... I would be interested in CH stats for Asian countries.... where smoker percentage is (or was) MUCH higher. Betcha whether ya smoke or not is minimally causal re CH..........tis more likely the other way around. |
Title: Re: Therapeutic party Post by AussieBrian on Jun 16th, 2016 at 1:37am
I can see that the statistics suggest we CHeads are a little more likely to be smokers or use illicit drugs than are an average of the population, and our wonky hypothingummy points us in this direction.
It's interesting to note, however, that many of these horrible and illegal drugs are showing us the promise of hope. What the statistics don't explain is how every one of our lady CHeads and Supporters is so stunningly beautiful. |
Title: Re: Therapeutic party Post by Callico on Jun 16th, 2016 at 12:44pm
I may very well have misunderstood the study. I'm with Jon in mistrusting many of them, anyway. Most go into it with a preconceived notion and data is manipulated to say what they want it to say.
Most clusterheads that I know who use/have used illicit drugs recreationally did so before the onset of CH. Those I know who use them post CH primarily use them to combat it, i.e. shrooms, LSD. Jerry |
Title: Re: Therapeutic party Post by maz on Jun 16th, 2016 at 1:03pm
Brian - I thought that was barmaids ??? ;D
|
Title: Re: Therapeutic part Post by BobG on Jun 17th, 2016 at 8:52am Callico wrote on Jun 16th, 2016 at 12:44pm:
Some professors, scientists, researcher, etc must be "published" regularly as part of their job/ pay checks. It brings in big $$'s to universities, manufacturers. 63%' no, 72%, wait, 79, 88%, yeah 88% of all statistics are made up on the spot. |
Title: Re: Therapeutic party Post by BarbaraD on Jun 17th, 2016 at 12:56pm
And there's a 98% odds that all statistics are made up in Vegas.. right Bob? :-*
|
Title: Re: Therapeutic part Post by jon019 on Jun 17th, 2016 at 2:24pm BobG wrote on Jun 17th, 2016 at 8:52am:
Bob...I am 94% certain that you are 47% correct...within 2 standard deviations....and I'll gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today! ................. |
New CH.com Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.4! YaBB © 2000-2009. All Rights Reserved. |