New CH.com Forum
http://www.clusterheadaches.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl
Cluster Headache Help and Support >> Medications,  Treatments,  Therapies >> Occipital Nerve Stimulation--2012 overview
http://www.clusterheadaches.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1345304021

Message started by Bob Johnson on Aug 18th, 2012 at 11:33am

Title: Occipital Nerve Stimulation--2012 overview
Post by Bob Johnson on Aug 18th, 2012 at 11:33am
Neuromodulation. 2012 Aug 6. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2012.00490.x.

Long-Term Outcome in Occipital Nerve Stimulation Patients With Medically Intractable Primary Headache Disorders.
Brewer AC, Trentman TL, Ivancic MG, Vargas BB, Rebecca AM, Zimmerman RS, Rosenfeld DM, Dodick DW.
SourceCollege of Medicine, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA; Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA; and Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Abstract
Introduction:  Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) may provide relief for refractory headache disorders. However, scant data exist regarding long-term ONS outcomes. Methods:  The methods used were retrospective review of the medical records of all (nonindustry study) patients who were trialed and implanted with occipital nerve stimulator systems at our institution, followed by a phone interview. Up to three attempts were made to contact each patient, and those who were contacted were given the opportunity to participate in a brief phone interview regarding their ONS experience. Data for analysis were gleaned from both the phone interview and the patient's medical records. Results:  Twenty-nine patients underwent a trial of ONS during the 8.5-year study period. Three patients did not go on to permanent implant, 12 could not be contacted, and 14 participated in the phone interview. Based upon the phone interview (if the patient was contacted) or chart review, ONS was deemed successful in five of the 12 migraine, four of the five cluster headache, and five of the eight miscellaneous headache patients, and therapy was documented as long as 102 months. In one of the 26 patients, success of ONS could not be determined. Among patients deemed to have successful outcomes, headache frequency decreased by 18%, severity by 27%, and migraine disability score by 50%. Fifty-eight percent of patients required at least one lead revision.

Discussion:  These results, although limited by their retrospective nature, suggest that ONS can be effective long term despite technical challenges. The number of patients within each headache subtype was insufficient to draw conclusions regarding the differential effect of ONS. Conclusions:  Randomized controlled long-term studies in specific, intractable, primary headache disorders are indicated.

© 2012 International Neuromodulation Society.

PMID:22882274[PubMed]

Title: Re: Occipital Nerve Stimulation--2012 overview
Post by wimsey1 on Aug 21st, 2012 at 10:21am
I didn't think the results for CHs was all that encouraging, but if I remained intractable at a high level of intensity, I'd sign up for the trial in a heartbeat. Any place in a storm and all that. Thanks for the info, Bob. blessings. lance

Title: Re: Occipital Nerve Stimulation--2012 overview
Post by Mommy of 5 on Aug 27th, 2012 at 2:42am
My husband had a nerve stimulator implanted in 2010 and made it nearly two full years without a headache.  He in now in the middle of a second CH episode which usually lasts 3 months or so.  Starting to lose all hope that this thing actually works...

Title: Re: Occipital Nerve Stimulation--2012 overview
Post by ttnolan on Aug 27th, 2012 at 4:40pm
It may not work. It is not uncommon for a regularly scheduled episodic to go two years without a cycle just out of the blue. That is the nature of the beast.

New CH.com Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.4!
YaBB © 2000-2009. All Rights Reserved.