Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
Clusterheadaches.com
 
Search box updated Dec 3, 2011... Search ch.com with Google!
  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegisterEvent CalendarBirthday List  
 





Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Bar Stool Economics? (Read 1471 times)
Melissa
CH.com Moderator
CH.com Alumnus
*****
Offline


Don't give up!


Posts: 7238
Central WI, USA
Gender: female
Bar Stool Economics?
Oct 22nd, 2008 at 10:53pm
 
For any number crunchers, does this seem right to you?  I checked on snopes and couldn't find anything...

Quote:
Bar Stool Economics

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten
comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it
would go something like this:

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that's what they decided to do. The ten men drank in the bar every
day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the
owner threw them a curve. 'Since you are all such good customers, he
said, 'I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20. Drinks
for the ten now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the
first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But
what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they
divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share?'
They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted
that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would
each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggested
that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same
amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.

And so:

The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).
The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).

Each of the six was better off than before And the first four continued
to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to
compare their savings.

'I only got a dollar out of the $20', declared the sixth man.
He pointed to the tenth man,' but he got $10!'

'Yeah, that's right', exclaimed the fifth man. 'I only saved a dollar,
too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than I!'
'That's true!!' shouted the seventh man. 'Why should he get $10 back
when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!'

'Wait a minute,' yelled the first four men in unison. 'We didn't get
anything at all. The system exploits the poor!'

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat
down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill,
they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money
between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our
tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most
benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being
wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might
start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.
Back to top
  

Diseases can be our spiritual flat tires - disruptions in our lives that seem to be disasters at the time but end by redirecting our lives in a meaningful way.  ~Bernie S. Siegel
https://www.facebook.com/mellymoo92  
IP Logged
 
Callico
CH.com Hall of Famer
*****
Offline


Author of "Stranded at
Romson's Lodge


Posts: 4916
Aurora IL
Gender: male
Re: Bar Stool Economics?
Reply #1 - Oct 22nd, 2008 at 11:18pm
 
That is the Reagan tax cut and the Bush tax cut in a parable.  check it out for yourself.  It isn't hard to find the percentages of the cuts to the different tax brackets, and it is exactly the way the Democrats are portraying the "Tax Cuts for the Wealthy". 

Reagan cut the taxes to "the wealthy" from 70% to 29%, and ushered in the longest peace time economic expansion in history.  Along with that, receipts to the US Treasury more than doubled, and over 20 Million new jobs were generated. 

If you don't like a Republican example, go back and see what happened when John F Kennedy cut taxes.  I don't have the numbers handy, but they were of the same type.

Jerry
Back to top
  

"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a piece of dung by the clean end." Texas A&M Student (unknown)
Jerry Callison  
IP Logged
 
Marc
Ex Member
****




Gender: male
Re: Bar Stool Economics?
Reply #2 - Oct 22nd, 2008 at 11:34pm
 
And........if we raise their taxes even more, the high income earners will simply put more money into things like Tax Free Municipal Bonds instead of stimulating the economy with investments. Wouldn't you?

Think about it.
Back to top
  
 
IP Logged
 
Just Plain Carl
CH.com Old Timer
****
Offline


IT IS WHAT IT IS


Posts: 449
Royal Oak, Michigan
Gender: male
Re: Bar Stool Economics?
Reply #3 - Oct 22nd, 2008 at 11:47pm
 
Great analogy. 
I need to borrow this to explain to some people that just don't get it.
Back to top
  
 
IP Logged
 
notseinfeld
CH.com Hall of Famer
*****
Offline


Enough is Enough.    
   Vote Libertarian


Posts: 789
x1|Atlanta|USA|usa|425|226|GA,Georgia
Gender: male
Re: Bar Stool Economics?
Reply #4 - Oct 23rd, 2008 at 11:26am
 
Who is John Galt?
Back to top
  

Democracy is three wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner.
WWW krilldocument  
IP Logged
 
FramCire
CH.com Alumnus
***
Offline


Life like a froward child
must be humored a little


Posts: 1710
Bolivar, MO USA
Gender: male
Re: Bar Stool Economics?
Reply #5 - Oct 23rd, 2008 at 11:53am
 
I found it on snopes when I got a copy attributed to a specific economist.  The origin is to this day unknown.  Since it is really just an illustration, there is nothing for snopes to research outside of the original author and to that end they do not know.

Multimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!!  You need to Login or Register
Back to top
  

You've overstayed your welcome since the day we met but it doesn't seem to matter to you.  No medications are your master, nothing makes you fret, it's a helpless feeling having nothing I can do
 
IP Logged
 
monty
CH.com Hall of Famer
*****
Offline




Posts: 1056
The Swamp, Florida
Re: Bar Stool Economics?
Reply #6 - Oct 23rd, 2008 at 12:09pm
 
Marc wrote on Oct 22nd, 2008 at 11:34pm:
And........if we raise their taxes even more, the high income earners will simply put more money into things like Tax Free Municipal Bonds instead of stimulating the economy with investments. Wouldn't you?

Think about it.


Ok - thought about it.  It's good. Tax-free muni bonds are tax-free for a reason ... they encourage investment in roads, schools, stadiums, libraries, prisons, and other things that state and local governments decide to invest in. They are relatively safe, but boring. The tax breaks encourage some people to diversify and hold a bit more of that type of investment.

McCain has said before that when people make lots of money, it is reasonable to tax them at a somewhat higher rate, and that the progressive income tax is not socialism:

Multimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!!  You need to Login or Register


Adam Smith, who wrote "Wealth of Nations" (as a textbook and promo of capitalism) also said that a progressive income tax makes sense - the people on the bottom of the ladder spend most of their money on necessities, and a flat amount or flat rate tax would be unfair:

Quote:
The necessaries of life occasion the great expense of the poor. They find it difficult to get food, and the greater part of their little revenue is spent in getting it. The luxuries and vanities of life occasion the principal expense of the rich, and a magnificent house embellishes and sets off to the best advantage all the other luxuries and vanities which they possess. A tax upon house-rents, therefore, would in general fall heaviest upon the rich; and in this sort of inequality there would not, perhaps, be anything very unreasonable. It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.

Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 23rd, 2008 at 12:11pm by monty »  

The outer boundary of what we currently believe is feasible is far short of what we actually must do.
 
IP Logged
 
Kilowatt3
CH.com Old Timer
****
Offline


1952 Jag


Posts: 300
Lake Charles, Louisiana - USA
Gender: male
Re: Bar Stool Economics?
Reply #7 - Oct 23rd, 2008 at 12:18pm
 
notseinfeld wrote on Oct 23rd, 2008 at 11:26am:
Who is John Galt?

He's alive and well in Colorado.
Back to top
  

Regards,
Jim
SW Louisiana

If "that which does not kill me, makes me stronger", then how come I always feel like $hit after every near-death experience?
WWW kilowatt3  
IP Logged
 
Linda_Howell
CH.com Moderator
CH.com Alumnus
*****
Offline


Do not feed the Moderators


Posts: 11927
Santa Maria, Ca.
Gender: female
Re: Bar Stool Economics?
Reply #8 - Oct 23rd, 2008 at 12:23pm
 


     A $100.oo for 10 lousy beers????????


That many beers shouldn't cost more than 40     Grin Grin
Back to top
  

Hurt people.....hurt people.   Think about it.
WWW calientev8 N/A N/A  
IP Logged
 
fubar
Ex Member



Re: Bar Stool Economics?
Reply #9 - Oct 23rd, 2008 at 12:25pm
 
Mellisa,

That is a great example of how it works, but it involves a little thinking to understand it... you know how much that is discouraged in these times.

-Shawn
Back to top
  
 
IP Logged
 
Kevin_M
CH.com Sponsor
***
Offline


withered branches grow
green again.


Posts: 8754
Michigan, USA
Gender: male
Re: Bar Stool Economics?
Reply #10 - Oct 23rd, 2008 at 7:32pm
 
Bar stool's probably a pretty sharp one, it's just what's sittin' on it that people move their chairs away from.
Back to top
  
 
IP Logged
 
Jonny
Ex Member



Re: Bar Stool Economics?
Reply #11 - Oct 23rd, 2008 at 7:46pm
 
Melissa wrote on Oct 22nd, 2008 at 10:53pm:
For any number crunchers, does this seem right to you?  I checked on snopes and couldn't find anything...

Quote:
Bar Stool Economics

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten
comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it
would go something like this:

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that's what they decided to do. The ten men drank in the bar every
day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the
owner threw them a curve. 'Since you are all such good customers, he
said, 'I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20. Drinks
for the ten now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the
first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But
what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they
divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share?'
They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted
that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would
each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggested
that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same
amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.

And so:

The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).
The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).

Each of the six was better off than before And the first four continued
to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to
compare their savings.

'I only got a dollar out of the $20', declared the sixth man.
He pointed to the tenth man,' but he got $10!'

'Yeah, that's right', exclaimed the fifth man. 'I only saved a dollar,
too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than I!'
'That's true!!' shouted the seventh man. 'Why should he get $10 back
when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!'

'Wait a minute,' yelled the first four men in unison. 'We didn't get
anything at all. The system exploits the poor!'

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat
down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill,
they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money
between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our
tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most
benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being
wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might
start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.


Yeah!, thats why I stopped going to conventions.....LOL  Grin Wink
Back to top
  
 
IP Logged
 
BarbaraD
CH.com Alumnus
***
Offline


Hugs to ya


Posts: 8333
Douglasville, TX
Gender: female
Re: Bar Stool Economics?
Reply #12 - Oct 24th, 2008 at 7:17am
 
But we STILL Charge the Beers to you darling.... Smiley

Hugs BD
Back to top
  

What don't kill ya, Makes ya stronger!
 
IP Logged
 
fubar
Ex Member



Re: Bar Stool Economics?
Reply #13 - Oct 24th, 2008 at 3:33pm
 
From each according to their ability, to each according to their need.
Back to top
  
 
IP Logged
 
TomM
CH.com Hall of Famer
*****
Offline




Posts: 2133
Montgomery Village, MD, USA
Gender: male
Re: Bar Stool Economics?
Reply #14 - Oct 24th, 2008 at 5:26pm
 
Linda_Howell wrote on Oct 23rd, 2008 at 12:23pm:
    A $100.oo for 10 lousy beers????????


That many beers shouldn't cost more than 40     Grin Grin


Have you ever been to Washington, DC??? Now you'll understand the parable even more.
TomM
Back to top
  

"Everyone should believe in something. I believe I'll go fishing." --Thoreau--
http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/profile.php?id  
IP Logged
 
FramCire
CH.com Alumnus
***
Offline


Life like a froward child
must be humored a little


Posts: 1710
Bolivar, MO USA
Gender: male
Re: Bar Stool Economics?
Reply #15 - Oct 24th, 2008 at 5:46pm
 
Noone said they each only got 1 beer.  It didnt say they went out for "a beer".

So, the guess is they had more than 1 beer each.
Back to top
  

You've overstayed your welcome since the day we met but it doesn't seem to matter to you.  No medications are your master, nothing makes you fret, it's a helpless feeling having nothing I can do
 
IP Logged
 
superhawk2300
CH.com Hall of Famer
*****
Offline




Posts: 901
New Berlin, WI
Gender: male
Re: Bar Stool Economics?
Reply #16 - Nov 10th, 2008 at 12:08am
 
Adam Smith has been called "the father of capitolism" and "the inventor of capitolism". He was in favor of heacy luxury taxes and a progressive tax system was was VERY heavey on the top end. It has been a while since I have read his stuff but I think he went as far as 90% tax rate on the richest in the country.

Modern day people love to label stuff after they change what the meaning is behind what they just changed.
Back to top
  
WWW 1107217852  
IP Logged
 
Charlie
CH.com Alumnus
***
Offline


Happy to be here


Posts: 18971
Jamestown, NY
Gender: male
Re: Bar Stool Economics?
Reply #17 - Nov 10th, 2008 at 8:09pm
 
The tax rate on the upper end in the 1950s reached as high as 90% for a time....generally thought of as one of the golden ages of capitalism.

Charlie
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 10th, 2008 at 8:09pm by Charlie »  

There is nothing more satisfying than being shot at without result---Winston Churchill
135447360 mondocharlie mondocharlie  
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print

DISCLAIMER: All information contained on this web site is for informational purposes only.  It is in no way intended to be used as a replacement for professional medical treatment.   clusterheadaches.com makes no claims as to the scientific/clinical validity of the information on this site OR to that of the information linked to from this site.  All information taken from the internet should be discussed with a medical professional!