elliot - No, I'm not taking sides. But I cannot dismiss the dopamine idea. Restraining myself from sex or masturbation is not a realistic prospect for this sucker, but if someone will in order to produce results related to you hypotehsis, I praise them.
But be aware - From time to time people show up on this board with "the final solution" to CH, and quite a few are well, pissed and also concerned that sufferers in their desperation will waste valuable life and suffer great pain all in vain. I respect that, and so should you.
(Edit, expanding:)
A number of people on this board have a lifetime of CH experience. I myself have 21. You have 3. Most of us are painfully aware that the causality behind CH is complex, not simple. It is almost common that people show up on the board with a message of
restrain from this or
restrain from that,
do this, do that, do less of this or
more of that and your CH will be gone.
If you search, you will find people advocating masturbation as the best abortive ever. Please consider this, and store it somewhere in the back of your mind. If nothing, it will help you understand the opposition you've faced. Basically, we're a collective, having accumulated hundreds. maybe thousands of years of severe pain saying Don't f. with us. Again, please consider this. Some of us smell snake oil miles away.
(done expanding)
Over to the science here. I'm not able to tell if dopamine and CH is not related. In fact I got a hunch you're on to something. But the theory will have to explain quite a number of phenomena related to CH - like:
- Why can one masturbate multiple times a day, all the year, and still suffer from CH only in periods?
- Why can I have sex at all?
- Why are some people episodics and others chronics?
- Why does Imitrex and O2 abort?
- Why do a number of stuff prevent?
(expanding)
My general belief is that we must accept, allow and even encourage bad ideas in order to get the good ones. This requires a certain environment. Bad ideas may inspire the better ones, and very often they do. Good ideas are born from a graveyard of bad ideas, as I see it.
This is why I welcome ideas, even strange and apparently stupid ones. Obviously the complete understanding of CH requires knowledge not yet revealed. It may even require a paradigmatic shift in the science of brain chemistry, or electricity to explain CH. This is why I'm open, and not instinctively dismissive. Sometimes the truth is not the obvious. All practicality says that if I throw a ball, I apply an amount of power that drives the ball ahead, and when that power is consumed, the ball will hit the ground. Like an airplane with a limited amount of fuel. Enjoying very special minds like Newton, we know that this is not how it works. For all I know, the understanding of CH may require a similar ground-breaking thought, an idea that seems incredibly stupid - at first.
Having said that - there is logic, the best tool ever created. And there is this board which is the best source of information about CH in the known universe.
Just to make sure it is mentioned.
(done expanding)
Having an opposed idea is hard. But I wish you good luck!