Posted by Annemarie (126.96.36.199) on May 22, 2000 at 10:24:29:
In Reply to: At this point you could ... posted by Riccardo on May 22, 2000 at 09:38:41:
I. Asimov was a good enough scientific journalist. He wrote a small number of bits and pieces that still have charm after all these years. After that he turned into a shit machine...All right.
Van Vogt I despise, Clarke is all right as a writer but a most unpleasant person to be with, Fred Pohl has all my admiration and I love Tad Williams Ursula LeGuin, Jack Vance, Ted Sturgeon and Christopher Priest. But ask me again next monday and I'll tell you different.
I do read French, but not well enough to really enjoy a storty, so I don't know Masali. BTW Did you know a story of mine was published in an anthology sandwiched between Sturgeon and Asimov? Now that really IS boasting.
Post a Followup