Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
Clusterheadaches.com
 
Search box updated Dec 3, 2011... Search ch.com with Google!
  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegisterEvent CalendarBirthday List  
 





Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Diagnosis: need for good work-up (Read 658 times)
Bob Johnson
CH.com Alumnus
***
Offline


"Only the educated are
free." -Epictetus


Posts: 5965
Kennett Square, PA (USA)
Gender: male
Diagnosis: need for good work-up
Sep 19th, 2008 at 11:38am
 
While we talk about the need for scans when making a diagnosis for headache, I have very rarely seen hard data to help make a judgment on whether a scan is needed.

These limited data from the UK at least hint at some risk factors which may trigger CH-like headache; point at some of the hidden neurological conditions which can present as CH and, therefore, give some idea of the degree of threat which should be considered when making a judgment about whether to scan or not.
=================

Cephalalgia. 2008 Sep 2. [Epub ahead of print]Related Articles, Links
What happens to new-onset headache presented to primary care? A case-cohort study using electronic primary care records.

Kernick D, Stapley S, Goadsby P, Hamilton W.

St Thomas Medical Group, Exeter, UK.

In the UK, 4% of general practitioner consultations are for headache, yet the natural history of these presentations is unknown. The objective of this study was to describe the outcome of new headache presentations to the general practitioner. This was a prospective case-control study in adults over a period of 1 year using data from the General Practitioner Research Database, UK.
RECORDS OF PATIENTS WHO PRESENTED WITH PRIMARY HEADACHE (MIGRAINE, TENSION-TYPE HEADACHE, CLUSTER HEADACHE) OR UNDIFFERENTIATED HEADACHE (NO FURTHER DESCRIPTOR) WERE EXAMINED FOR THE SUBSEQUENT YEAR FOR SUBARACHNOID HAEMORRHAGE, PRIMARY BRAIN TUMOUR, BENIGN SPACE-OCCUPYING LESION, TEMPORAL ARTERITIS, STROKE AND TRANSIENT ISCHAEMIC ATTACK. WE IDENTIFIED 21 758 PRIMARY HEADACHES AND 63 921 UNDIFFERENTIATED HEADACHES. THE LIKELIHOOD RATIO WAS 29 (9.9, 92) FOR A SUBARACHNOID HAEMORRHAGE AFTER AN UNDIFFERENTIATED HEADACHE AND INCREASED WITH AGE. THE 1-YEAR RISK OF A MALIGNANT BRAIN TUMOUR WITH NEW UNDIFFERENTIATED HEADACHE WAS 0.15%, RISING TO 0.28% ABOVE THE AGE OF 50 YEARS. FOR PRIMARY HEADACHE THE RISK WAS 0.045%. THE RISK FOR A BENIGN SPACE-OCCUPYING LESION WAS 0.05% FOR AN UNDIFFERENTIATED AND 0.009% FOR A PRIMARY HEADACHE. THE RISK OF TEMPORAL ARTERITIS WAS THE HIGHEST OF THE CONDITIONS STUDIED, 0.66% IN THE UNDIFFERENTIATED AND 0.18% IN THE PRIMARY HEADACHE GROUP.
Accepting the limitations of this approach, our data can inform management guidelines for new presentations of headache in primary care and confirm the need for follow-up, even if a primary headache diagnosis is made.

PMID: 18771496 [PubMed]
Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 21st, 2008 at 10:07am by Bob Johnson »  

Bob Johnson
 
IP Logged
 
Ray
CH.com Alumnus
***
Offline


Ray


Posts: 1996
Columbus, Ohio
Gender: male
Re: Diagnosis: need for good work-up
Reply #1 - Sep 20th, 2008 at 2:19am
 
Thanks for the reference Bob.  You rock!

Ray
Back to top
  

You have my prayers and compassion-I'm right there with you.

Dum tempus habemus, operemur bonum

*While we have the time, let us do good*

Multimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!!  You need to Login or Register
WWW raymond.schwartz759 rayplace raymond.schwartz759 raymond759  
IP Logged
 
thebbz
Ex Member



Re: Diagnosis: need for good work-up
Reply #2 - Sep 20th, 2008 at 7:04pm
 
Thanks agian Bob. the more ya know.
the bb
Back to top
  
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print

DISCLAIMER: All information contained on this web site is for informational purposes only.  It is in no way intended to be used as a replacement for professional medical treatment.   clusterheadaches.com makes no claims as to the scientific/clinical validity of the information on this site OR to that of the information linked to from this site.  All information taken from the internet should be discussed with a medical professional!