Maybe there is a little bit of research being done to look for a cause and then a cure, but by "science", I meant the one most neuros follow, some kind of official (I guess) protocol that sees us taking meds aimed at another condition like verapamil, lowering symptoms but not at all working on any cause or cure. My neuro and the others at that headache clinic claim that there is no need to look for a cure since their treatment works in lowering the symptoms. "This works, so why change?", she told me that twice as I questioned the treatment and side effects.

I don't know... it seems to me whatever domain, it's always a good thing to question whether what we do is the right way to do it, whether there are better ways, other ways, new ways... Why is it I have the feeling they are not very interested in their job? I feel that in these highly intellectual domains, they should be curious and interested in finding better treatment... they're not mechanics or carpenters (in all respect), they work with the unknown. Why is it that when I suggest to my neuro the hypothalamus might be at the center of the problem, she grins and jumps to the next subject? I get the message that she thinks this is only assumptions with no evidence, so not worth looking at.
That's what I meant by off track, not a handfull of searchers who actually are interested, but probably most neuros dealing first hand with the patients.
If I had not asked for a testing of my sexual hormones level and vitamin D3 level, I would have never known about that track leading maybe to a solution. (this part was auto-censored by the author) . Reading these boards (here and CB), I have learned a lot in 3 weeks, and I have a clear feeling most neuros are lacking this information. That's what, for me, being off the track is: staying on the sideline with the same ol' beliefs and not even searching for any new finding... just waiting for it to fall from the sky... from one of the handful ones who actually are interested and curious to go further.
And Bob J, a person very close to me had cancer and all science (his oncologist) had to say after he refused to have all 8 chemotherapy treatments (he had 5 I think) was: I give you 6 months to live. But that was 15 years ago and that person claims he cured himself with only the help of his searches and naturopathy. I actually never believed his "natural" treatments had cured him, but now that I busted my cycle with RC seeds, a solution totally unknown to my neuro (?), I'm starting to believe he actually did cure himself from cancer with natural ways.
My generalization might be bold or cheeky, but I feel I have the right to be a bit angry seeing the inaction of the professionals I (we) meet. 

Sam, after my 1st bust (60 RC seeds), the day after, it was terrible HAs, but 2 days after I had a PF day, then it started again on the 3rd day. I still couldn't sleep at night, but daytime yes, somewhat, and the HA weren't so bad but shadow and all very much there. Same picture after 2nd bust : terrible day the day after, better 2 days after, then gradually better. The 3rd bust did the trick, then the 4th one as I was feeling it was coming back, killed it all.
5 days in between each bust.
Are you on clusterbusters.com? lots of opinions as to how many seeds, how to extract... some ppl have better results with ''vitamin M'', some better with seeds...