Posted by gary g (184.108.40.206) on September 15, 1999 at 11:44:53:
In Reply to: Do our bodies have biologic calanders? posted by David D on September 15, 1999 at 00:57:52:
think there's some misunderstanding here
everything I've seen in recent years suggests the 21-30 age bracket is the most common time for ONSET of the CH problem, but doesn't necessarily represent a MAJORITY even - - anyway, that is a GROUP statistic, and doesn't apply validly to any individual one way or the other
on the other hand-
the idea of a peak has more individual implications,because:
(1) it is more subjective (they start when they start, it is REAL hard to accurately pin down a "peak" and it would involve a lot of standardized definitions and assumptions we don't have now
(2) the 'returns seem to be all over the place as far as long-term experience with cluster patterns once they've started
I know I've never seen any literature suggesting there is a standard "peak" to the syndrome
On the other hand - I think your observation of hman biologic, light/environmental cycles at the annular level is EXTREMELY important
keep thinking !
keep asking !
keep seeking !
Post a Followup