Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
Clusterheadaches.com
 
Search box updated Dec 3, 2011... Search ch.com with Google!
  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegisterEvent CalendarBirthday List  
 





Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Back again after two years... pred verap question (Read 1162 times)
jmc
CH.com Junior
**
Offline


I love YaBB 1G - SP1!


Posts: 25
x0|Austin|USA||0|0|TX,Texas
Gender: male
Back again after two years... pred verap question
Jul 2nd, 2009 at 10:16am
 
Hello all,
Haven't been here in a while since I haven't had a visit from the ghastly beast in two years... he's back again.  Started getting chs again a couple of weeks ago, not so bad at first but raging bastards since.  Anyhow, my last cycle I was prescribed a pred taper after being hit for a few weeks and it knocked the hits out cold and they were done for that cycle (couldn't believe it).

My question is this:  I guess I naively thought that starting the preds this time would be equally as effective for me as the last time, but this time, while not getting them that frequently they are still hitting me pretty bad while on the pred.  In your experience, does this mean that once I'm off the taper I'll be hit again full force?  I also just started verapamil for the first time yesterday and woke up with a real bad one last night, not sure of a correlation on that either.  Any verap  gurus out there?

Have oxygen and zomig spray to abort and they're working pretty well so I'm not in that bad a shape, but I'm just trying to figure this cycle out and halt the SOB. 

Hope everyone is maintaining out there and sorry for the long and probably incoherent post (didn't sleep much and these meds have me feeling insane).

jmc
Back to top
  
 
IP Logged
 
Bob Johnson
CH.com Alumnus
***
Offline


"Only the educated are
free." -Epictetus


Posts: 5965
Kennett Square, PA (USA)
Gender: male
Re: Back again after two years... pred verap question
Reply #1 - Jul 2nd, 2009 at 1:46pm
 
It may be worth trying another round of Pred but with a higher starting dose. There is no fixed starting point but my impression is that 60 to 100mg is common.
=======
Verap takes several days to begin to operate, perhaps upwards of two-weeks. Sending along a newly recognized side effect which you may not be aware of.
----------
Headache. 2004 Nov;44(10):1013-8.   

Individualizing treatment with verapamil for cluster headache patients.

Blau JN, Engel HO.

    Background.-Verapamil is currently the best available prophylactic drug for patients experiencing cluster headaches (CHs). Published papers usually state 240 to 480 mg taken in three divided doses give good results, ranging from 50% to 80%; others mention higher doses-720, even 1200 mg per day. In clinical practice we found we needed to adapt dosage to individual's time of attacks, in particular giving higher doses before going to bed to suppress severe nocturnal episodes. A few only required 120 mg daily. We therefore evolved a scheme for steady and progressive drug increase until satisfactory control had been achieved. Objective.-To find the minimum dose of verapamil required to prevent episodic and chronic cluster headaches by supervising each individual and adjusting the dosage accordingly. Methods.-Consecutive patients with episodic or chronic CH (satisfying International Headache Society (IHS) criteria) were started on verapamil 40 mg in the morning, 80 mg early afternoon, and 80 mg before going to bed. Patients kept a diary of all attacks, recording times of onset, duration, and severity. They were advised, verbally and in writing, to add 40 mg verapamil on alternate days, depending on their attack timing: with nocturnal episodes the first increase was the evening dose and next the afternoon one; when attacks occurred on or soon after waking, we advised setting an alarm clock 2 hours before the usual waking time and then taking the medication. Patients were followed-up at weekly intervals until attacks were controlled. They were also reviewed when a cluster period had ended, and advised to continue on the same dose for a further 2 weeks before starting systematic reduction. Chronic cluster patients were reviewed as often as necessary. Results.-Seventy consecutive patients, 52 with episodic CH during cluster periods and 18 with chronic CH, were all treated with verapamil as above. Complete relief from headaches was obtained in 49 (94%) of 52 with episodic, and 10 (55%) of 18 with chronic CH; the majority needed 200 to 480 mg, but 9 in the episodic, and 3 in the chronic group, needed 520 to 960 mg for control. Ten, 2 in the episodic and 8 in the chronic group, with incomplete relief, required additional therapy-lithium, sumatriptan, or sodium valproate. One patient withdrew because verapamil made her too tired, another developed Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and the drug was withdrawn. Conclusions.-Providing the dosage for each individual is adequate, preventing CH with verapamil is highly effective, taken three (occasionally with higher doses, four) times a day. In the majority (94%) with episodic CH steady dose increase under supervision, totally suppressed attacks. However in the chronic variety only 55% were completely relieved, 69% men, but only 20% women. In both groups, for those with partial attack suppression, additional prophylactic drugs or acute treatment was necessary. (Headache 2004;44:1013-1018).
========
Verapamil warning
« on: Aug 21st, 2007, 10:38am »   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I posted this information recently in the form of a news release but more details here.
__________________

Neurology. 2007 Aug 14;69(7):668-75. 

 
Electrocardiographic abnormalities in patients with cluster headache on verapamil therapy.

Cohen AS, Matharu MS, Goadsby PJ.

Headache Group, Institute of Neurology, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK.

BACKGROUND: High dose verapamil is an increasingly common preventive treatment in cluster headache (CH). Side effects include atrioventricular block and bradycardia, although their incidence in this population is not clear. METHOD: This audit study assessed the incidence of arrhythmias on high dose verapamil in patients with cluster headache. RESULTS: Of three hundred sixty-nine patients with cluster headache, 217 outpatients (175 men) received verapamil, starting at 240 mg daily and increasing by 80 mg every 2 weeks with a check electrocardiogram (EKG), until the CH was suppressed, side effects intervened, or to a maximum daily dose of 960 mg. One patient had 1,200 mg/day. Eighty-nine patients (41%) had no EKGs. One hundred eight had EKGs in the hospital notes, and a further 20 had EKGs done elsewhere. Twenty-one of 108 patients (19%) had arrhythmias. Thirteen (12%) had first-degree heart block (PR > 0.2 s), at 240 to 960 mg/day, with one requiring a permanent pacemaker. Four patients had junctional rhythm, and one had second-degree heart block. Four patients had right bundle branch block. There was bradycardia (HR < 60 bpm) in 39 patients (36%), but verapamil was stopped in only 4 patients. In eight patients the PR interval was lengthened, but not to >0.2 s. The incidence of arrhythmias on verapamil in this patient group is 19%, and bradycardia 36%. CONCLUSION: We therefore strongly recommend EKG monitoring in all patients with cluster headache on verapamil, to observe for the potential development of atrioventricular block and symptomatic bradycardia.

PMID: 17698788 [PubMed]

« Reply #7 on: Today at 1:01am » WITH THANKS TO "MJ" FOR POSTING THIS EXPLANATION. 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The article summarized in layman terms from the website below.

Multimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!!  You need to Login or Register

"Cluster Headache Treatment Poses Cardiac Dangers 
Off-label use of verapamil linked to heart rhythm abnormalities, study finds 

By Jeffrey Perkel
HealthDay Reporter   

MONDAY, Aug. 13 (HealthDay News) -- People who use a blood pressure drug called verapamil to treat cluster headaches may be putting their hearts at risk.

That's the finding from a British study that found heart rhythm abnormalities showing up in about one in five patients who took the drug in this unapproved, "off-label" way.

"The good news is, when you stop the drug, the effect wears off," said study lead author Dr. Peter Goadsby, professor of neurology at University College London. "So, as long as doctors know about it, and patients with cluster headaches on verapamil know they need EKGs [electrocardiograms] done, it is a completely preventable problem." 

The study is published in the Aug. 14 issue of Neurology.

In a review of the medical records of 217 patients given verapamil to treat their cluster headaches, a team led by Goadsby found that 128 had undergone an EKG, 108 of which were available in the medical records.

Of those 108 patients, about one in five exhibited abnormalities (mostly slowing) in the heart's conduction system -- the "natural pacemaker" that causes the organ to beat. Most of these cases weren't deemed serious, although one patient did end up having a pacemaker implanted to help correct the problem. In four cases, doctors took patients off verapamil due to their EKG findings.

One in three (34 percent) developed non-cardiac side effects such as lethargy and constipation. 

"It is a very nice piece of work, because it provides commentary on a boutique [that is, niche and off-label] use of the drug," said Dr. Domenic Sica, professor of medicine and pharmacology in the Virginia Commonwealth University Health System. He was not involved in the study.

Cluster headache affects about 69 in every 100,000 people, according to the Worldwide Cluster Headache Support Group Web site. Men are six times more likely than women to be afflicted, and the typical age of onset is around 30. According to Goadsby, the disease manifests as bouts of very severe pain, one or many times per day, for months at a time, usually followed by a period of remission. 

Verapamil, a calcium-channel antagonist drug, is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias and high blood pressure. The medicine is typically given in doses of 180 to 240 milligrams per day to help ease hypertension. 

However, the patients in this study received more than twice that dose for the off-label treatment of their cluster headaches -- 512 milligrams per day on average, and one patient elected to take 1,200 milligrams per day. The treatment protocol involved ramping up the dose from 240 milligrams to as high as 960 milligrams per day, in 80 milligram increments every two weeks, based on EKG findings, side effects, and symptomatic relief. 

Many patients may not be getting those kinds of tests to monitor heart function, however: In this study cohort, about 40 percent of patients never got an EKG. 

Given the typical dosage, Sica said he was surprised so many patients were able to tolerate such high amounts of the drug.

"When used in clinical practice for hypertension, the high-end dose is 480 milligrams," said Sica. "Most people cannot tolerate 480."

Dr. Carl Pepine, chief of cardiology at the University of Florida, Gainesville, was also "amazed" at the doses that were tolerated in this study. "The highest dose I ever gave [for cardiology indications] was 680 milligrams. This might give me more encouragement to use the drug at higher dose," he said. 

But Sica said he thought cardiac patients -- the typical verapamil users -- were unlikely to tolerate the drug as well as the patients in this study, because verapamil reacts differently in older individuals, who are more likely to have high blood pressure, than in younger patients. The average patient in the United Kingdom study was 44 years old. 

According to Sica, two factors would conspire to make older individuals more sensitive to verapamil. First, the metabolism of the drug is age-dependent, meaning that older individuals would tend to have higher blood levels of the drug, because it is cleared more slowly than in younger individuals.

Secondly, the conduction system of the heart (the natural "pacemaker" becomes more sensitive to the effects of verapamil with age, Sica said. 

"It's likely that an older population would not be able to tolerate the same dose," he concluded. 

According to Goadsby, the take-home message of this study is simple: Be sure to get regular EKGs if you are taking verapamil for cluster headaches. Goadsby recommended EKGs within two weeks of changing doses, and because problems can arise over time -- even if the dose doesn't change -- to get an EKG every six months while on a constant dose. 

"The tests are not expensive, and they are not invasive," he said. "They are not in any way a danger to the patient."

For the most part, Goadsby said, should a cardiac problem arise, it will typically go away once the treatment is halted." 





Back to top
  

Bob Johnson
 
IP Logged
 
Marc
Ex Member
****




Gender: male
Re: Back again after two years... pred verap question
Reply #2 - Jul 2nd, 2009 at 7:14pm
 
Keep in mind that some confusion occurs with Pred:

- A "dose pack" of Methylpredisolone is a 6-7 day course at 4mg each tablet for 24mg the first day, tapering to 4 mg on the last day. It is intended to be a very powerful, but short blast of Pred for a short duration.

- Standard Prednisone is different, and prescribed in much higher doses per tablet (like 10mg, 20mg, 40 mg or much higher each) over a longer time.

They are NOT the same thing. I don't know which you are using, but I'll assume it's the former because you saw Dr. Cain.

For Clusters, Prednisone provides temporary relief while your other preventative meds like Verapamil have a chance to kick in.

How high is your Verapamil dose now?

You need to get a high flow regulator for your O2 tanks. I will eventually convince Dr. Cain to prescribe full flow O2. Just give me some time, I've only seen him once  Wink

Marc
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jul 2nd, 2009 at 7:20pm by Marc »  
 
IP Logged
 
ellenjoanne
CH.com Junior
**
Offline




Posts: 77
Greenfield, WI
Gender: female
Re: Back again after two years... pred verap question
Reply #3 - Jul 3rd, 2009 at 11:26pm
 
jmc wrote on Jul 2nd, 2009 at 10:16am:
My question is this:  I guess I naively thought that starting the preds this time would be equally as effective for me as the last time, but this time, while not getting them that frequently they are still hitting me pretty bad while on the pred.  In your experience, does this mean that once I'm off the taper I'll be hit again full force?  I also just started verapamil for the first time yesterday and woke up with a real bad one last night, not sure of a correlation on that either.  Any verap  gurus out there?

Have oxygen and zomig spray to abort and they're working pretty well so I'm not in that bad a shape, but I'm just trying to figure this cycle out and halt the SOB.  

Hope everyone is maintaining out there and sorry for the long and probably incoherent post (didn't sleep much and these meds have me feeling insane).

jmc


Hi jmc,

What you experienced, isn't uncommon for CH.   For the first 1 1/2 years (from mid 2005 till early 2007) after I started treatment for my CH (I began having CH in 1999), a Predinsone taper, was more than enough to stop my cycles.  Welllllllll in early Feb. 2007, I found out the hard way, that you can have CH while on Prednisone.  

In early Feb. 2007, I suffered a major  attack (about kip 9) while on Pred.  At first when it happened, I ignored it (after all, I'd never had an attack while taking Pred., so it couldn't be happening right?).  Then as the pain ramped up I figured the Pred, woul make the  attack shorter nd less painfull - wrong!!  Of course by that time (about 10 minutes into the attack), it was too late for me.  I took my abortives, and they didn't work.  So I basically suffered for (crying, pacing, writhing on my bed) for the next hour and a half.  

Since that time, I've had a few major CH attacks while taking Pred., but for it to bust a CH cycle, I've ended up having to take two courses of it in some cases, since I've had instances where within less than a week after finishing a course of Pred, the headaches have slammed back into me at full force.   This was the case with cycle that I'm in at the present time.    I took a one week taper, and about 4 days after I completed it, the CH returned.  Because of increasing concerns over the years about the effects of Prednisone, if my cycle doesn't stop after one taper regimen, my neuro won't use a second taper regimen anymore to cycle bust.  Instead, I've been put on some other meds semi-long term (Methergine the last cycle, and Lyrica this cycle) to keep the headaches down.  Also my Verapamil (which I have been on non-stop since 2005), was upped permanently from 360 mg/day to 480 mg/day, out of concerns that I was building a tolerance to it, and it was becoming less effective.

Sorry about the rambling above, but I guess what I was trying to illustrate, is that over time, CH can change, and what may have worked at one time, may no longer work.  

Hang in there,  Smiley
Ellen
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jul 3rd, 2009 at 11:29pm by ellenjoanne »  
 
IP Logged
 
jmc
CH.com Junior
**
Offline


I love YaBB 1G - SP1!


Posts: 25
x0|Austin|USA||0|0|TX,Texas
Gender: male
Re: Back again after two years... pred verap question
Reply #4 - Jul 4th, 2009 at 7:24pm
 
Sorry for posting and then not replying to your help, it's been a rough few days as the O2 and Zomig have stopped working altogether... had to resort to stadol last night for the first time.  YIKES!!!

Anyhow, thanks for the replies.  The pred taper I'm on is 60mg for four days, 40mg for four days, and 20mg for 4 days.  I'm currently on my second day of 20mg and I'm getting hammered hard with zero relief from O2 or zomig the last couple of days. 

I actually stopped taking the verapamil because I couldn't stand how it was making me feel, might have to start again I guess. 

Should I ask my doc to start another pred taper with different doses to see if that knocks it out or try something different?  Get back on the verap?  Neuro also said we could try depakote but I don't know much about it.  Thanks for the help, here's to some PFDANs for everyone out there.

Jerod
Back to top
  
 
IP Logged
 
Marc
Ex Member
****




Gender: male
Re: Back again after two years... pred verap question
Reply #5 - Jul 5th, 2009 at 10:33pm
 
jmc wrote on Jul 4th, 2009 at 7:24pm:
.......................it's been a rough few days as the O2 and Zomig have stopped working altogether.......................

Jerod


Jerod,

What brand/model # O2 regulator are you using? What does your mask set up look like? 

You may be missing some relief well within your reach. Post a picture of your setup, we may be able to help!

Marc
Back to top
  
 
IP Logged
 
jmc
CH.com Junior
**
Offline


I love YaBB 1G - SP1!


Posts: 25
x0|Austin|USA||0|0|TX,Texas
Gender: male
Re: Back again after two years... pred verap question
Reply #6 - Jul 6th, 2009 at 8:38am
 
Will do, it's clustermasx though, but I'm using it a little differently than others I think as I am using a tube in my mouth only at 15 lpm.  Maybe I am doing it wrong, but it seems that I'm getting full oxygen, breathing in through mouth, out through nose at 15 lpm.  

Back to top
  
Multimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!!  You need to Login or Register photo.jpg (Attachment deleted)
 
IP Logged
 
jmc
CH.com Junior
**
Offline


I love YaBB 1G - SP1!


Posts: 25
x0|Austin|USA||0|0|TX,Texas
Gender: male
Re: Back again after two years... pred verap question
Reply #7 - Jul 6th, 2009 at 8:43am
 
It's a praxair regulator, goes up to 25 lpm.
Back to top
  
Multimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!!  You need to Login or Register photo.jpg (Attachment deleted)
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print

DISCLAIMER: All information contained on this web site is for informational purposes only.  It is in no way intended to be used as a replacement for professional medical treatment.   clusterheadaches.com makes no claims as to the scientific/clinical validity of the information on this site OR to that of the information linked to from this site.  All information taken from the internet should be discussed with a medical professional!