Posted by Monique (18.104.22.168) on February 23, 2000 at 11:30:31:
In Reply to: Why? posted by Todd on February 22, 2000 at 22:06:16:
No anger here, just wondering. If as you say CH can't be cured. Does this mean that if someone is Cured they (in your opinion) didn't have CH in the first place? That being the case, IF (God willing or what ever force it be) Greg is cured via the tea, did he NOT have CH? If THIS be your opinion, what do you consider a viable diagnosis? Since he has been diffinitively diagnosed by four nuro's and MRI scanning. Was this a mistake, and if it wasn't should we just give up on hoping that the tea does infact work completely as it has for Rider and Flash? Did they not have CH?
Just wondering....:) No anger, I would just like to now what you believe to be a difinitive diagnosis etc.
Post a Followup