Posted by Luke (208.236.74.65) on January 22, 2001 at 12:02:44:
In Reply to: About Probability posted by Ueli on January 22, 2001 at 09:41:43:
First of all I clearly stated, that it was highly unlikely, not impossible. So in essence, you wasted your breath on the "abuse of statistical laws" speech, which by the way was a very strong over-dramatization on your part.
As to the children 8 to 10(at least the 10 part specifically), I acknowledged this in my message. However, 2 is FAR from the age of 8.
My entire opinion, which I stand by, is based on probablility, and information I've gathered in the past. You might also want to take notice of the fact that since NEITHER one of us has any factual basis for our opinions, we must rely STRICTLY on probability. And probability-wise, my opinion is MUCH more likely than yours. Ask any neurologist.
Also, I'd like to add that I believe your entire purpose in this message was to disagree with me. You responded like a child to one of my previous posts, calling me conceited and whatnot because I stated a high gpa(for no reason other than to make a point about lithium not affecting my memory), and attempted to insult me with the term "junior". Thus, I find your opinion, and yours only, to be of no value or consequence. I believe you like bickering with me.
Luke.